Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Why Drug Prohibition is the Ultimate Injustice

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

August 9, 2025



Drug prohibition is a meta-injustice. It seeks to get inside our very biochemistry and control the way that we think and feel about the world around us. How does it do this? By denying us all the godsend medicines that could give us a blessed respite from ourselves, from our negative inner voices, drugs which could open up new worlds for us and keep us from being psychologically lorded over, night and day, by an oppressive psychological status quo. The Drug War politician is like a despot who is not satisfied with simply oppressing his people by denying them their inalienable right to Mother Nature's bounty: he wants to make sure that his people never successfully "rise above" this oppression, even in their own minds. He wants them to eat their hearts out, to always recognize their subservient status in the world. He wants a total psycho-political victory over his people, one in which each and every one of them are forever consciously aware of the government's ownership of their very minds and moods.

In the anglophile tradition, one's home is said to be one's castle -- a sanctuary into which government dare not intrude -- and yet one's body clearly belongs to the state in the age of the Drug War, right down to the chemicals that course through that body at any given moment. This is the apotheosis of the nanny state. And yet this enormously invasive status quo is championed by conservatives who claim to be enemies of Big Government? What?! Please! These are the guys who tool around in cars with license plates reading "Don't tread on me," meanwhile encouraging the use of government to decree how and how much we are each allowed to think and feel in this life. Talk about TREADING!? That is downright stomping!

It is as if the conservative were telling government: "Don't tread on me! However, please keep limiting my ability to transcend negative mental states by outlawing the kinds of medicines that have inspired entire religions in the past. Please keep telling me which plants and fungi I may access as a resident of planet Earth. Please keep telling me how and how much I can think and feel in this life. Other than that, you'd better keep your hands off me. Oh, except for drug testing 1 , of course. Feel free to keep me from earning a living in the United States if my urine should be found to contain godsend medicines of which racist and fearmongering politicians disapprove."


 (abolishthedea.com)

It is a truism to say that we cannot change the world and that therefore we have to change ourselves -- but the Drug War outlaws even this latter option for most people. How? By denying them the kinds of substances that alone could help them transcend the status quo.

And so drug prohibition is not just an example of a bad social policy: it is the ne plus ultra of bad social policies. It is the ultimate tyranny. It not only puts oppressive power in the hands of the government, but it limits our ability to make our peace with that injustice. And so the Drug Warrior can not only pass oppressive legislation, but they can demand through drug prohibition that we feel as badly as possible, as often as possible, about that legislation.

This is what happens when we allow the government to limit our mental flexibility and resilience through the unprecedented wholesale criminalization of psychoactive medicine.

And yet this disempowerment is just the beginning of the downsides of the racist policy of drug prohibition -- which include the destruction of inner-cities, the mass arrest of minorities and the end of the rule of law in Latin America -- not to mention the election of Donald Trump himself, who is only in office today because drug law has effectively removed over a million minorities from the voting rolls.

This is the real reason why drug use is outlawed in historically despotic countries today. Our modern mandarins do not simply want to control the lives of their fellow human beings -- they want it to be UNDERSTOOD that they exercise such control. That is why they favor drug prohibition: they want to outlaw the use of all drugs that could help the hoi polloi to inhabit mental realities in which the government does not even exist, or else exists only as a kind of comic relief, worthy only of magnanimous and good-natured scorn. In short, such Drug War despots reason as follows: "WE are the ones calling the shots in this world -- and the people must be made to understand that fact and to FEEL IT to be true, 24/7."









Notes:

1: Drug Testing and the Christian Science Inquisition DWP (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




There would be little or no profiling of blacks if the Drug War did not exist.

Freud thought cocaine was a great antidepressant. His contemporaries demonized the drug by focusing only on the rare misusers. That's like judging alcohol by focusing on alcoholics.

The Thomas Jefferson Foundation is a drug war collaborator. They helped the DEA confiscate Thomas Jefferson's poppy plants in 1987.

Materialist scientists cannot triumph over addiction because their reductive focus blinds them to the obvious: namely, that drugs which cheer us up ACTUALLY DO cheer us up. Hence they keep looking for REAL cures while folks kill themselves for want of laughing gas and MDMA.

Wade Davis wrote in Rolling Stone that cocaine was outlawed because 400 people consumed toxic doses worldwide. SO WHAT?! 178,000 people die from alcohol every year in America alone.

Chesterton might as well have been speaking about the word 'addiction' when he wrote the following: "It is useless to have exact figures if they are exact figures about an inexact phrase."

After watching my mother suffer because of the drug war, I hate to hear people tell me that the problem is drugs. WRONG! That's a western colonialist viewpoint. God loved his creation (see Genesis). He did not make trash. We need to use entheogenic medicines wisely.

What I want to know is, who sold Christopher Reeves that horse that he fell off of? Who was peddling that junk?!

Drug Warriors will publicize all sorts of drug use -- but they will never publicize sane and positive drug use. Drug Warrior dogma holds that such use is impossible -- and, indeed, the drug war does all it can to turn that prejudice into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Getting off some drugs could actually be fun and instructive, by using a variety of other drugs to keep one's mind off the withdrawal process. But America believes that getting off a drug should be a big moral battle.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Drama lovers: collect full-cast recordings of classic plays

In my spare time, when I am not shaming drug warriors for their heartless drug policies, I create full-cast recordings of classic plays using the latest in synthetic voices licensed by the Natural Reader company. Snag your copy of my production of Volpone, by Ben Jonson... and follow me on Payhip for more where that came from, including classics like The Post Office, The Double Dealer and The Inspector General. -- Yours in all-too-justified outrage, the Drug War Philosopher @ abolishthedea.com.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)