computer screen with words DRUG WAR BLOG bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter


How the Media Puts Drugs on Show Trials

an open letter to Bennett Haeberle of NBC 5 Chicago

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher



June 3, 2025



he media regularly puts on show trials for psychoactive substances, to suggest that they are a threat to American young people, with the implication being that said substances have no positive uses whatsoever and can only be used for a cheap thrill. Lies, lies, lies. The ultimate goal of such yellow journalism is to egg on the prohibitionists to crack down ever further on the few remaining freedoms that Americans still possess when it comes to drug use.

The poster child for such biased articles is the January 2025 hatchet piece on the NBC 5 website entitled "The loophole that allows an illegal, dangerous drug to be delivered to your door,1" an article in which the reporters completely ignore all glaringly obvious benefits of N2O, to say nothing of historical use of the drug and the fact that William James urged philosophers to inhale N2O in order to investigate the nature of ultimate reality.

All such hatchet jobs are based on two demonstrably false assumptions: 1) that there are no upsides to drug use, and 2) that there are no downsides to drug prohibition.

--

Dear Bennett Haeberle,

Your article about Laughing Gas2 illustrates all that is wrong with our Drug War mentality. You consider only the worst possible uses of laughing gas, never mentioning its obvious benefits. The gas has been used safely by a wide variety of people, from Humphry Davy to Robert Southey to Oliver Wendell Holmes. Davy saw great therapeutic potential in its ability to elate and inspire. William James told us that philosophers must study the states produced by such substances to learn about the nature of human consciousness and ultimate reality. And yet your article says nothing about common-sense therapy or the philosophy of William James. Nitrous oxide can inspire glimpses of heaven and yet you say nothing about its obvious potential role in preventing suicide. Instead, your article is written to make us fear the substance rather than to understand it.

Drug prohibition is the problem, Bennett, not drugs. The problem is our failure to educate about substance use. We already live in a police state thanks to drug law: why is NBC 5 determined to make matters even worse?

Kids were not dying in the streets from opiates when opiates were legal in America. It took prohibition to accomplish that. When are prohibitionists going to start accepting their responsibility for the young people whom they have killed? How? By refusing to teach safe use, refusing to regulate product, and refusing to re-legalize a long list of opiate alternatives?

Laughing gas kits should be available for the severely depressed, just as epi pens are made available to those with severe depression. Instead, America would rather that the depressed commit suicide than use drugs. America would prefer that the depressed undergo brain-damaging shock therapy than to use drugs.

Until the media stops putting on show trials for drugs -- and holding them to wildly different safety standards than those for Big Pharma or alcohol -- then America will be living in the Dark Ages.

You guys are not saving anybody. You are causing suicides by demonizing all the substances that could be wisely used to make people want to live. Your reportage ultimately causes suicides by removing all inspiring drugs from the market and refusing to teach or regulate. The Hindu religion was created thanks to the use of a drug that inspired and elated. You guys are committed to demonizing all drugs that inspire and elate. It is not enough for you to merely outlaw use -- you insist on closing all the loopholes as well -- to make sure that use becomes as dangerous, unregulated and uninformed as possible. But like all Drug Warriors, you never take responsibility for all the suffering that you thereby bring about. You seem to feel that if you do not report on the downsides of prohibition, then those downsides do not exist.

I am a philosopher, and I protest on behalf of William James, whose proposed research you guys are helping to outlaw by your fear mongering about substance use.

Please stop putting substances on show trials for crimes that alcohol commits every day. Drugs can be used safely. Any drug can be rendered dangerous, however, when we place a premium on ignorance and prohibition.

Please stop demonizing substances based on the fact that they can be misused by Americans whom we refuse to educate about drugs.

Your MO is too predictable:

1) Find young people who have misused a drug thanks to our refusal to educate about safe use.
2) Pull at the heartstrings by writing about the poor little white kids who have been thrown into harm's way.
3) Write articles in an attempt to have all "loopholes" closed -- so that drug prohibition thrives and so our young people remain as ignorant as possible about safe drug use.
4) Then refuse to take responsibility for the downsides of the drug prohibition to which you have contributed: the outlawing of free research, the unnecessary suicides, the unnecessary drive-by shootings, the un-necessary electroshock therapy, the destruction of the rule of law in Latin America, and the mass incarceration of minorities which has led to the election of tyrants and brought an end to democracy in America.
5) Above all, never mention the potential upsides of drug use or the many obvious downsides of drug prohibition.

Enough! Please, let's have no more show trials for psychoactive substances!


Brian Quass
The Drug War Philosopher



Notes:

1 Haeberle, Bennett, The loophole that allows an illegal, dangerous drug to be delivered to your door , NBC 5 Chicago, 2025 (up)
2 Haeberle, Bennett, The loophole that allows an illegal, dangerous drug to be delivered to your door , NBC 5 Chicago, 2025 (up)



computer screen with words DRUG WAR BLOG


Next essay: The One Thing that Timothy Leary Got Wrong
Previous essay: The Drug War Philosopher of the United States of America -- session 3

More Essays Here




Some Tweets against the hateful war on drugs

Psychiatrists never acknowledge the biggest downside to modern antidepressants: the fact that they turn you into a patient for life. That's demoralizing, especially since the best drugs for depression are outlawed by the government.
In 1886, coca enthusiast JJ Tschudi referred to prohibitionists as 'kickers.' He wrote: "If we were to listen to these kickers, most of us would die of hunger, for the reason that nearly everything we eat or drink has fallen under their ban."
I can't believe that no one at UVA is bothered by the DEA's 1987 raid on Monticello. It was, after all, a sort of coup against the Natural Law upon which Jefferson had founded America, asserting as it did the government's right to outlaw Mother Nature.
The confusion arises because materialists insist that every psychological problem is actually a physical problem, hence the disease-mongering of the DSM. This is antithetical to the shamanic approach, which sees people holistically, as people, not patients.
The media called out Trump for fearmongering about immigrants, but the media engages in fearmongering when it comes to drugs. The latest TV plot line: "white teenage girl forced to use fentanyl!" America loves to feel morally superior about "drugs."
Drug testing labs are the modern Inquisitors. We are not judged by the content of our character, but by the content of our digestive systems.
Rather than protesting prohibition as a crackdown on academic freedom, today's scientists are collaborating with the drug war by promoting shock therapy and SSRIs, thereby profiting from the monopoly that the drug war gives them in selling mind and mood medicine.
Aleister Crowley actually TRIED to get addicted to drugs and found he could not. These things are not inevitable. The fact that there are town drunkards does not mean that we should outlaw alcohol.
That's why I created the satirical Partnership for a Death Free America. It demonstrates clearly that drug warriors aren't worried about our health, otherwise they'd outlaw shopping carts, etc. The question then becomes: what are they REALLY afraid of? Answer: Free thinkers.
I know. I'm on SNRIs. But SSRIs and SNRIs are both made with materialist presumptions in mind: that the best way to change people is with a surgical strike at one-size-fits-all chemistry. That's the opposite of the shamanic holism that I favor.
More Tweets



The latest hits from Drug War Records, featuring Freddie and the Fearmongers!


1. Requiem for the Fourth Amendment



2. There's No Place Like Home (until the DEA gets through with it)



3. O Say Can You See (what the Drug War's done to you and me)






front cover of Drug War Comic Book

Buy the Drug War Comic Book by the Drug War Philosopher Brian Quass, featuring 150 hilarious op-ed pics about America's disgraceful war on Americans



You have been reading an article entitled, How the Media Puts Drugs on Show Trials: an open letter to Bennett Haeberle of NBC 5 Chicago, published on June 3, 2025 on AbolishTheDEA.com. For more information about America's disgraceful drug war, which is anti-patient, anti-minority, anti-scientific, anti-mother nature, imperialistic, the establishment of the Christian Science religion, a violation of the natural law upon which America was founded, and a childish and counterproductive way of looking at the world, one which causes all of the problems that it purports to solve, and then some, visit the drug war philosopher, at abolishTheDEA.com. (philosopher's bio; go to top of this page)