Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Pissed Off About Drug Testing

an exhibition of protest art from the Drug War Museum

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

January 24, 2026




Digital montage depicts an art gallery exhibition about the Drug War. The blood-colored words 'Drug War' are splattered on the white walls, on which are hung op-ed pictures highlighting the tyrannous idiocy of drug prohibition.
Imagine a museum exhibition that demonstrated the anti-democratic idiocy of drug prohibition.




(see also Visualize the Injustice of Drug Prohibition at the Drug War Museum)

GUIDE: Welcome to the Drug War Museum, folks. This is the line for the guided tour of the Drug Testing Gallery! Everyone please line up with your urine samples ready so that we can determine if you are morally fit to see this exhibition. Just kidding. That's just a little Drug War humor there, folks.

MAN: Yes, VERY little.

GUIDE: Okay, well, THAT'S hurtful. Right this way, folks. Extra, extra, read all about it: presenting indiscriminate drug testing: the most outrageous violation of the Fourth Amendment conceivable by the diabolical brains of the logically challenged Drug Warriors!

WOMAN to child: Shh, honey, the man is speaking!

GUIDE: That's right, junior. The man is speaking about this masterpiece by artist Coglin Hoth entitled "Do Your Part." Don't you feel patriotic just looking at this picture? Makes you want to go right out and find an entry-level job violating the most basic rights of your fellow human beings, doesn't it?!


Picture hanging on blood-stained museum wall. Young woman in white lab coat holding glass bottle of yellow urine. Superimposed words on picture: Urine testers needed! Do your part to enforce Drug War Sharia.
The artist here asks us to contemplate the shocking amorality of the lab techs who help destroy the Bill of Rights by prying like a perverted bluestocking into the urine of their fellows, like modern-day witch hunters.




O Say does that Star-Spangled Banner still wave? Answer: Not for drug scumbags like Benjamin Franklin it doesn't, not anymore, friends. We now extend our zero tolerance in BOTH directions of the spacio-temporal timeline, thank you very much.

And right around this next corner we have... don't tell me... wait, I've got this...


Ad for Schedule 1 Laundry Detergent 'for those special moments', bottle on top left. In center, young proud father fixing tie on his preteen son, with the caption 'It's his very first drug test!'
Schedule 1 Laundry Detergent -- because it's not enough to pass your drug test anymore, you need to pass it with flying colors!




GROUP: Awww!

GUIDE: I know, right. Just look at that, will you? Artist Freskin Pith has captured the spirit of 'The Big Day' here, as he calls it, that day when your parents took you for your very first drug test.

And now if you'll slide your no-doubt delighted orbs one picture to the right... we take you from the present to the future.


Man in public bathroom urinating in urinal, with a sign overhead reading: PLANT MED DETECTED... URINAL 2... Police officer approaches on left
America: where you are judged, not by the color of your skin, but by the content of your digestive system.




Artist Peth Runkin calls this one 'Smart Urinal,' for obvious reasons. Peth estimates that all public urinals and toilets -- and many home models as well -- will be fully online by 2050 and be able to automatically check urine for literally any substance that might improve your mind or mood (that is to say the mind or mood of the 'evacuee,' if you will) -- finding which, of course, the appliance in question will automatically notify the appropriate authorities in real-time so that they can take immediate action. What are you moaning about, folks? You gave away your birthright ownership of your bodily fluids decades ago when you blithely submitted to causeless drug testing in the naive belief that there were no basic principles involved in that surrender.

What, I'm just sayin'...

Some say that this particular innovation might even trigger the Second Coming of Mary Baker Eddy herself!

Never heard of the old bluestocking, eh? No worries. Hit up the museum bookstore on your way out for a $50 biography entitled: "You think YOU hate drugs!!!"

To be fair, Eddy's anti-drug attitude was, in part, a response to the scientific triumphalism of the 19th century, the age of the Crystal Palace against whose deadening efficiency Dostoevsky raged in his "Notes from Underground": a time when materialist science felt itself able to cure everything from physical ailments to psycho-spiritual angst without any help from the unquantifiable and therefore supposedly irrelevant forces of will and whimsy. She got it half right, in other words: science is indeed inherently unfit to help us with spiritual and/or psychological concerns insofar as it works by limiting variables rather than judging our lives as we live them, which is to say as a whole, in the context of an endless stream of interacting and overlapping forces. As Dostoevsky warns, real human beings will demand their right to be illogical and inefficient, in mockery of your crazed belief that efficiency is the ultimate good! And yes, junior, this WILL be on the TEST, okay, son? Junior's over there furiously scribbling away in his notebook, going like: "...spiritual... concerns... insofar as..."

That said, however, it does not follow that we should forswear the godsend psychoactive medicines that are either created by Mother Nature or inspired thereby. If the shoe fits, wear it, and God or nature clearly designed our brains such that we are indeed designed to profit from such substances. So why deny it? If a friend gives you a rain gauge for Christmas, you put it out in the rain. You do not ignore the obvious and try to think of a second best reason why he or she might have given it to you. You don't go, "Why, bless my heart, whatever am I supposed to do with THIS? You don't suppose that it is a new musical instrument of some kind, do you?"

All right, follow me, folks, to the last provocative masterpiece of the day. Hut, 2, 3, 4, hut, 2, 3, 4... companyyyy... halt!


Man in meeting, standing, pointing to whiteboard: 'And what is the first step in finding a good employee?' Seated audience member: 'Check their piss to make sure that they're not Christian Science heretics.'
Drug testing is the extrajudicial enforcement of the drug-hating religion of Christian Science. Americans must renounce their time-honored rights to healing and to Mother Nature herself or lose their right to earn a living.




Halt right in front of this picture entitled 'The First Step' by Tipkin Padget. (Now, there's a name to conjure with!)

Feast your eyes while I regale you with an instructive anecdote related to this poignant chef d'oeuvre. You know, my cousin is a manager at Costco and I heard him chatting with an employee at my sister's house about how the company hired people based on the content of their character rather than the color their skin. So they're standing right in front of me, and I'm sitting there nursing a bottle of soda and trying not to laugh. I desperately wanted to say: "Yo, dude: you judge them by the contents of their digestive systems -- in fact, your basic attitude toward the American workforce is that Christian Science heretics can starve to death as far as the company is concerned."

I really did come close to "checking them down" with some home truths on the topic of drug prohibition, but it was a family party so I went outside and screamed and then came back in the house and was good to go again. Speaking of which, I pity young Americans who have to give up their time-honored right to due process because gun-loving and beer-loving Americans have decided that drugs that improve their mind and mood pose a threat to national security. Such Drug Warriors are surely the descendants of the Cavemen of yore who considered FIRE to be a threat to Paleolithic Security. But then if I've said it before, I've said it again: Saying things like "Fentanyl kills" is philosophically equivalent to saying "Fire bad!" Both statements would have us fear psychoactive substances rather than to learn how to use them wisely for the benefit of human beings.

Speaking of which, please look to your right on the way out, folks, to see a picture conveying that very message. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you "Fire Bad!" by Chavin Peacock III! (Where do these artists get these NAMES?!)


Two cavemen in cave. Caveman on right, holding burning stick toward second caveman on left. Caveman on left says: 'Fire bad. Fire kill.'
Saying things like 'Fentanyl kills' is philosophically equivalent to saying 'Fire bad'. Both statements would have us fear dangerous substances rather than to learn how to use them wisely for the benefit of human beings.










read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




In Mexico, the same substance can be considered a "drug" or a "med," depending on where you are in the country. It's just another absurd result of the absurd policy of drug prohibition.

The FDA should have no role in approving psychoactive medicine. They evaluate them based on materialist standards rather than holistic ones. In practice, this means the FDA ignores all glaringly obvious benefits.

Prohibition is a crime against humanity. It forces us to use shock therapy on the severely depressed since we've outlawed all viable alternatives. It denies medicines that could combat Alzheimer's and/or render it psychologically bearable.

The term "drugs" is no more objective than the term "scabs." Both are meant to defame the things that they denote.

Drugs are not the enemy, ignorance is -- the ignorance that the Drug War encourages by teaching us to fear drugs rather than to understand them.

Pundits tell us that there are medical reasons not to "snort" cocaine. So what? There are medical reasons not to drive a car: you may have an accident. The question is: does cocaine use or car driving make sense in a given case! Details matter!

As such, "we" are important. The sun is just a chaos of particles that "we" have selected out of the rest of the raw data and declared "This we shall call the sun!" "We" make this universe. Consciousness is fundamental.

We should no more arrest drug users than we arrest people for climbing sheer rock faces or for driving a car.

First we outlaw all drugs that could help; then we complain that some people have 'TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION'. What? No. What they really "have" is an inability to thrive because of our idiotic drug laws.

The formula is easy: pick a substance that folks are predisposed to hate anyway, then keep hounding the public with stories about tragedies somehow related to that substance. Show it ruining lives in movies and on TV. Don't lie. Just keep showing all the negatives.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)