mazing! The drug-leery censorship algorithms at the Internet Archive actually allowed me to post the following review of "The Varieties of Religious Experience" by William James1. I was initially irked by their requirement that I limit my effusions to 1,000 words, but then I reflected that this was probably for the best. It obliges me to pounce straight for the jugular in attacking the great psychologist's failure to connect the dots between Hinduism and the anesthetic revelation. I still give the book four out of five stars, however, insofar as James actually acknowledged the power of altered states -- and just in time, too -- for had he done so in modern times, he would have been kicked out of academia for such Drug War heresy.
William James discusses how the use of anesthetic compounds such as laughing gas can provide one with a tantalizing glimpse of new realities. "Our normal waking consciousness," quoth James, "is but one special type of consciousness." He fails to realize, however, that such "anesthetic revelations," as he calls them, comprise but a subset of the transcendent experiences that have been invoked purposefully for millennia by indigenous religious seekers with the use of psychoactive substances. Although James makes half a dozen references to Hinduism in this book, he never mentions the fact that the Hindu religion was inspired by the use of a psychoactive substance called Soma. Had he made the connection, America's demagogue politicians would have had a harder time convincing us that drugs were evil. Instead, they have succeeded so well that even James's alma mater, Harvard University, does not mention either laughing gas or the anesthetic revelation in their online biography of James2.
William James
William James (1842-1910) is considered the founder of American psychology. He urged philosophers to study the effects of substances like laughing gas for what they could tell us about reality writ large. And yet the bio of the man on the website of the Harvard Psychology Department fails to even mention this 'call to arms.' And so Harvard rewrites history to jibe with drug war prejudices, just as the Thomas Jefferson Foundation refuses to discuss the fact that it helped federal agents confiscate the founding father's poppy plants in a 1987 raid by Ronald Reagan's DEA. Existing institutions are all about normalizing the drug war by pretending that it does not exist. This saves our materialist psychologists and philosophers at Harvard from having to confront James' unpopular holistic views with rational arguments of their own. Instead, they can simply declare a victory for materialism by pretending that those views of his do not even exist! This is just one of the many reasons why I say that we live in a make-believe world today thanks to drug prohibition, one in which all of our major institutions ignore the role that prohibition has played -- and continues to play -- in skewing our views of reality.
Had the DEA been active in the Punjab and 1500 BCE, there would be no Hindu religion today.
I passed a sign that says "Trust Trump." What does that mean? Trust him to crack down on his opposition using the U.S. Army? Or trust him not to do all the anti-American things that he's saying he's going to do.
Why does no one talk about empathogens for preventing atrocities? Because they'd rather hate drugs than use them for the benefit of humanity. They don't want to solve problems, they prefer hatred.
I can't believe people. Somebody's telling me that "drugs" is not used problematically. It is CONSTANTLY used with a sneer in the voice when politicians want to diss somebody, as in, "Oh, they're in favor of DRUGS!!!" It's a political term as used today!
Mariani Wine is the real McCoy, with Bolivian coca leaves (tho' not with cocaine, as Wikipedia says). I'll be writing more about my experience with it soon. I was impressed. It's the same drink "on which" HG Wells and Jules Verne wrote their stories.
In preparing for my trip to Puerto Rico, I am being told about the "no-go" zones in the cities. No one mentions the fact that they were all created by drug prohibition. We just accept "no-go" zones as a fact of life. It's amazing what prohibitionists can get away with!
In a blog post about cohoba, the psychedelic used by the Taino people, the author says, "In no way shape or form am I advocating for the use of any kind of drugs."
What groveling!
You SHOULD be advocating for the use of sacred medicines and against imperialist prohibition!
It's depressing. I thought mycology clubs across the US would be protesting drug laws that make mushroom collecting illegal for psychoactive species. But in reality, almost no club even mentions such species. No wonder prohibition is going strong.
In "Four Good Days" the pompous white-coated doctor ignores the entire formulary of mother nature and instead throws the young heroin user on a cot for 3 days of cold turkey and a shot of Naltrexone: price tag $3,000.
Getting off some drugs could actually be fun and instructive, by using a variety of other drugs to keep one's mind off the withdrawal process. But America believes that getting off a drug should be a big moral battle.
Buy the Drug War Comic Book by the Drug War Philosopher Brian Quass, featuring 150 hilarious op-ed pics about America's disgraceful war on Americans
You have been reading an article entitled, Soma and the Anesthetic Revelation: How William James failed to connect the dots, published on March 31, 2025 on AbolishTheDEA.com. For more information about America's disgraceful drug war, which is anti-patient, anti-minority, anti-scientific, anti-mother nature, imperialistic, the establishment of the Christian Science religion, a violation of the natural law upon which America was founded, and a childish and counterproductive way of looking at the world, one which causes all of the problems that it purports to solve, and then some, visit the drug war philosopher, at abolishTheDEA.com. (philosopher's bio; go to top of this page)