Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


There's 'No Escape' from the downsides of drug prohibition

A philosophical review of the 2015 action thriller starring Owen Wilson and Pierce Brosnan

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

December 11, 2025



In the 2015 action thriller "No Escape," Owen Wilson stars as Jack, an American expat whose family is threatened by the sudden unleashing of rabid anti-western sentiment in some fictitious Arab country. After having improbably escaped with his wife and two young daughters from two high-rises, both of them surrounded by an angry mob, the middle-aged engineer receives some last-minute help from a scruffy and enigmatic British "tourist" named Hammond, played by Pierce Brosnan.


Poster for movie 'No Escape' with Pierce Brosnan and Owen Wilson
In the 2015 movie 'No Escape', the safest place in the city was the opium den, where people were not interested in murdering Americans wholesale. Opium smoker also do not beat their wives, as do beer drinkers.




But I will leave the movie review to the professional critics, the vast majority of whom never complain about cinematic drug bashing nor the violation of Constitutional norms in the name of fighting against the politically created boogieman called "drugs."1 I am just a philosopher who wishes to make a point about America's counterproductive attitude about drugs by asking a simple question about the movie "No Escape," to wit:

QUESTION: Where does Hammond take the family in order to ensure their safety?

ANSWER: To an opium den, of course!!


(abolishthedea.com)That's right, Hammond escorted the trio away from the recently bombed-out American Embassy and toward the slightly less bombed-out brothel-and-opium den nearby. And believe it or not, nobody complained about that itinerary. Jack's wife Annie did not mount a Christian Science high horse and shout: "Jack, these people are using drugs, for God's sake! I think we should take our chances out on the street amongst the whirring bullets! What kind of message does this send to our kids, that we should seek refuge in a flipping opium den, of all places! It makes a mockery of our frequent admonitions for them to 'just say no!'"

But of course there was method to Hammond's madness. Hammond hadn't lived amongst the hoi polloi here for nothing. He understood that opium smokers did not go out and search for victims to line up on the road in order to run them down with a truck. No, nightly opium smokers were generally content with living their own lives, thank you very much. They had no great burning desire to fire a machine-gun from a helicopter at a rooftop full of scurrying American tourists, children included. An opium den was indeed the safest place in the bullet-riddled town.

How ironic! The plot of this movie basically happened in real life back in 1979 during the Iran Hostage Crisis. There was a rabid upswelling of anti-American sentiment in Tehran at that time as well. And guess who outlawed opium in Iran, the opium whose use could have moderated the screaming ferocity of those young men who paraded in front of the cameras while burning American flags? Opium was outlawed -- need I say -- by the hated Shah of Iran at the "request" of the United States of America!

And so brainwashed Americans ask, "Why are these people so hateful in their protests?" It is precisely because Americans prefer hatred to drug use. It is as simple as that.

The locals were responding to what they perceived as interference in their lives from America. Little did they realize that the greatest American interference of all was our decision on their behalf to outlaw their time-honored use of opium, thereby denying them a godsend medicine whose use could moderate their rage and turn it down more constructive pathways. There can be no greater interference in a person's life than for someone else to tell them how they are allowed to FEEL about their world!

And so, as so often happens in world affairs, Americans were hoisted by their own petard thanks to their childish, ahistorical and superstitious attitude toward time-honored substances.

AFTERTHOUGHT

I must remind the reader here that the Summers of Love on both sides of the Atlantic were outlawed by drug prohibitionists. They saw nothing good about peace, love and understanding. 2 3 All they saw were people using evil drugs -- LSD on this side of the Atlantic in the 1960s and Ecstasy on the British side in the 1990s 4 5. They hated drugs just like the cave people hated fire: they wanted to fear dangerous substances rather than to learn how to use them wisely for the benefit of human beings.

The fact is, Americans are so bamboozled by a lifetime of drug-bashing that they actually prefer gunfire, violence and the destruction of civil liberties over the use of time-honored medicines like opium!

And yet even the most open-minded Americans have been brainwashed into calling opium a "hard drug." Of course it's hard. It's hard because it works -- just like cocaine -- and that means the medical establishment is terrified of it! The medical industry would be downsized by 50% if opium and cocaine were re-legalized, and the industry will fight that common-sense desiderata with every penny in their well-funded healthcare advocacy campaigns on corporate-owned media. And yet it's not just opium and cocaine6 we're talking about here: all dangerous substances -- like fire and Botox -- can be used wisely, notwithstanding the slanderous defeatism of the Drug Warriors, who would have Americans remain children for life when it comes to drugs. That's why I have to see a doctor every three months of my life for a refill of a drug that I have been taking for 40 long years: because I STILL cannot be trusted to use the drug wisely without medical oversight7!

But that is drug prohibition for you: it is an exercise in infantilization. It brings about the complete disempowerment of Americans when it comes to taking care of their own health as they see fit, which, believe it or not, was historically considered the most basic of human rights! Thomas Jefferson knew, moreover, that we had a natural right to the plants and fungi that grow at our very feet.

"The earth, and all that is therein, is given to men for the support and comfort of their being.8"

These are the words of Jefferson's "go-to" man on the subject of natural law, John Locke, in his Second Treatise of Government.

And so drug prohibition is a crime twice over: first, it denies us our natural right to heal, and it denies us our natural right to the bounty of Mother Nature.

Drug prohibition is thus nothing less than a crime against humanity.









Notes for essay entitled There's 'No Escape' from the downsides of drug prohibition: A philosophical review of the 2015 action thriller starring Owen Wilson and Pierce Brosnan:

1: How Variety and its film critics support drug war fascism DWP (up)
2: The Drug War and Armageddon DWP (up)
3: Peaceful Societies: Hallucinogens for the Zapotec Bonta, Bruce, UNC Greensboro, 2016 (up)
4: LSD for puritans DWP (up)
5: How the Drug War killed Leah Betts DWP (up)
6: Cocaine is a Blessing, not a Curse DWP (up)
7: How Drug Prohibition turns Americans into patients for life DWP (up)
8: Second Treatise of Government Locke, John, Project Gutenberg, 1689 (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




"Everything one does in life, even love, occurs in an express train racing toward death. To smoke opium is to get out of the train while it is still moving. It is to concern oneself with something other than life or death." -Jean Cocteau

Prohibition never ended. Busybody Americans just gave alcohol a big Mulligan for killing 178,000 a year in America alone and then began fighting to outlaw everything else.

A pharmacologically savvy drug dealer would have no problem getting someone off one drug because they would use the common sense practice of fighting drugs with drugs. But materialist doctors would rather that the patient suffer than to use such psychologically obvious methods.

People magazine should be fighting for justice on behalf of the thousands of American young people who are dying on the streets because of the drug war.

To say that taking SSRIs daily is better than using opium daily is a value judgement, not a scientific one.

Rick Strassman reportedly stopped his DMT trials because some folks had bad experiences at high doses. That is like giving up on aspirin because high doses of NSAIDs can kill.

The formula is easy: pick a substance that folks are predisposed to hate anyway, then keep hounding the public with stories about tragedies somehow related to that substance. Show it ruining lives in movies and on TV. Don't lie. Just keep showing all the negatives.

We need to start thinking of drug-related deaths like we do about car accidents: They're terrible, and yet they should move us to make driving safer, not to outlaw driving. To think otherwise is to swallow the drug war lie that "drugs" can have no positive uses.

What bothers me about AI is that everyone's so excited to see what computers can do, while no one's excited to see what the human mind can do, since we refuse to improve it with mind-enhancing drugs.

If opium were legal, then most of the nostrums peddled by drug stores today would be irrelevant. (No wonder the drug war has staying power!)


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)