introduction to the Drug War Philosopher website at abolishthedea.com orange rss icon with stylized radio waves orange rss icon with stylized radio waves label reading 'add as a preferred source on Google' bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Fried Brains Over Easy: another Drug War Comedy Routine

live from the DEA Lounge

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

April 9, 2025



Click the audio link above to listen to the latest comedy routine 1 live from the DEA Lounge, featuring Adderall Zoloft and Paxil Buspar!


ADDERALL: Welcome to the DEA Lounge. My name is Adderall Zoloft.

PAXIL: And I'm Paxil Buspar.

ADDERALL: And we are here tonight to encourage you to just say no to godsend medicines.

PAXIL: That's right, Adderall.

ADDERALL: Say, Paxil, I hear that a majority of psychiatrists would like to receive electroshock therapy if they ever became severely depressed.

PAXIL: You're kidding me. You mean that they would rather have their brains damaged than to use the kinds of medicines that have inspired entire religions?

ADDERALL: Apparently so, Paxil.

PAXIL: That is hard to believe after you've read quotes about ecstatic drug use in books like "Pihkal" by Alexander Shulgin.

ADDERALL: What quotes, Paxil?

PAXIL: Quotes like these, Adderall.


"Excellent feelings. Tremendous opening of insights and understanding. A real awakening."

"This feels marvelous, and a whole new way to be much more relaxed, accepting, being in the moment. No more axes to grind. I can be free."

"I felt an enriched emotional affect, a comfortable and good feeling, and easy sleeping, with colorful and important dreams."


ADDERALL: Yeah. And now let's listen to a quote from someone who has just had electroshock therapy.

"Er... um... I feel... eeee.... shh... I'm sorry, what was the question again?




ADDERALL: That's all for now. I'm Adderall Zoloft.

PAXIL: And I'm Paxil Buspar.

ADDERALL: And we'll be here till Thursday -- or until the DEA figures out that we hate its guts, whichever comes first.

ANNOUNCER: This has been a presentation of the Drug War Philosopher @ abolishthedea.com, who reminds you that the Hindu religion was inspired by the use of a drug that inspired and elated, from which it follows that drug prohibition is the outlawing of religion. This is Goodman Johnny speaking. Stay tuned for more comic sendups of America's illogical, racist and superstitious Drug War, right here on abolishthedea.com.



Author's Follow-up:

April 25, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




Alfred North Whitehead wrote the following observation in "The Concept of Nature":

"The substantial reason for rejecting a philosophical theory is the 'absurdum' to which it reduces us."


Clearly, we need to reject materialism 2 -- at least in terms of its pretentions in the field of psychology. That ideology has led to the most absurd result imaginable: namely, the utter blindness of materialists to common sense -- to the extent that they would sacrifice their own gray matter on the altar of their faith in reductionist science.

Of course, we can ascribe at least some of the absurdity to the Drug War propaganda of censorship, which has censored all talk of positive drug use from our lives. But I never realized how successful that propaganda has been before I started encountering this conviction on the part of psychiatrists that brain damage was better than drug use.

Shock therapy is simply our modern version of blood letting. It is performed based on dogmatic assumptions and has nothing to do with common sense or even sanity.

Have these masochist psychiatrists never heard of Alexander Shulgin, or of the Hindu religion for that matter, or of the "quarterly carouses" of opium 3 using poets in the 19th century? Do they really think that the best way to treat depression is to decrease mental capacity? Do they really truly see no therapeutic power in elation and ecstasy and self-transcendence and rapture? Please tell me that these fans of brain damage are joking.

Well, I suppose Mary Baker Eddy would be proud of those of us who choose brain damage over the use of substances that are part of the politically demonized category called "drugs."






Author's Follow-up:

October 20, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




Shock therapy? How about trying cocaine first? Sigmund Freud considered it to be a cure for depression. The drug was demonized by doctors who saw their jobs disappearing should this panacea be available for the depressed. And so they judged the drug by focusing only on the vast MINORITY of people who misused it -- folks who were never educated about SAFE use in the first place. This is precisely as if they were to judge liquor by considering drunkards only. That's the REAL story about cocaine 4 5 : self-interested doctors threw the depressed under the bus. Their Hippocratic Oath was: first, make a buck.

That doctors today would prefer shock therapy shows that they have been duped by their own propaganda. Moliere parodied this gullibility 400 years ago in 'The Imaginary Invalid':

ARGAN: But doctors themselves must believe in the truth in their science since they use it on themselves.

BROTHER: That's because there are some in their number who suffer from the same delusion by which they profit.

--The Imaginary Invalid by Moliere, produced by Yuri Rasovsky










Notes:

1: COPS PRESENTS the top 10 traffic stops of 2023 DWP (up)
2: How materialists lend a veneer of science to the lies of the drug warriors DWP (up)
3: The Truth About Opium by William H. Brereton DWP (up)
4: Sigmund Freud's real breakthrough was not psychoanalysis DWP (up)
5: “Freud on Cocaine : Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.” 2023. Internet Archive. 2023. https://archive.org/details/freudoncocaine0000freu/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater. (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




In a free future, newspapers will have philosophers on their staffs to ensure that said papers are not inciting consequence-riddled hysteria through a biased coverage of drug-related mishaps.

We've all been taught since grade school that human beings cannot use psychoactive medicines wisely. That is a defeatest lie. It's criminal to keep substances illegal that can awaken the mind and remind us of our full potential in life.

So much harm could be reduced by shunting people off onto safer alternative drugs -- but they're all outlawed! Reducing harm should ultimately mean ending this prohibition that denies us endless godsends, like the phenethylamines of Alexander Shulgin.

Amphetamines are "meds" when they help kids think more clearly but they are "drugs" when they help adults think more clearly. That shows you just how bewildered Americans are when it comes to drugs.

Was looking for natural sleeping aids online. Everyone ignores the fact that all the stuff that REALLY works has been outlawed! We live in a pretend world wherein the outlawed stuff no longer even exists in our minds! We are blind to our lost legacy regarding plant medicines!

The problem with blaming things on addiction genes is that it whitewashes the role of society and its laws. It's easy to imagine an enlightened country wherein drug availability, education and attitudes make addiction highly unlikely, addiction genes or no addiction genes.

Drug prohibition began as a racist attempt to prevent so-called "miscegenation." The racist's fear was not that a white woman would use opium or marijuana or cocaine, but that she might actually fall in love with a Chinese, Hispanic or Black person respectively.

It's almost impossible not to have a problem with drugs in a world in which the government is spending over $50 billion a year to render drug use problematic.

"Everything one does in life, even love, occurs in an express train racing toward death. To smoke opium is to get out of the train while it is still moving. It is to concern oneself with something other than life or death." -Jean Cocteau

It's funny to hear fans of sacred plants indignantly insisting that their meds are not "drugs." They're right in a way, but actually NO substances are "drugs." Calling substances "drugs" is like referring to striking workers as "scabs." It's biased terminology.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


No cookies, no ads.


Attention, Teachers and Students: Read an essay a day by the Drug War Philosopher and then discuss... while it's still legal to do so!

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com. Updated daily.

Copyright 2025, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)