Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Fried Brains Over Easy: another Drug War Comedy Routine

live from the DEA Lounge

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

April 9, 2025



Click the audio link above to listen to the latest comedy routine 1 live from the DEA Lounge, featuring Adderall Zoloft and Paxil Buspar!


ADDERALL: Welcome to the DEA Lounge. My name is Adderall Zoloft.

PAXIL: And I'm Paxil Buspar.

ADDERALL: And we are here tonight to encourage you to just say no to godsend medicines.

PAXIL: That's right, Adderall.

ADDERALL: Say, Paxil, I hear that a majority of psychiatrists would like to receive electroshock therapy if they ever became severely depressed.

PAXIL: You're kidding me. You mean that they would rather have their brains damaged than to use the kinds of medicines that have inspired entire religions?

ADDERALL: Apparently so, Paxil.

PAXIL: That is hard to believe after you've read quotes about ecstatic drug use in books like "Pihkal" by Alexander Shulgin.

ADDERALL: What quotes, Paxil?

PAXIL: Quotes like these, Adderall.


"Excellent feelings. Tremendous opening of insights and understanding. A real awakening."

"This feels marvelous, and a whole new way to be much more relaxed, accepting, being in the moment. No more axes to grind. I can be free."

"I felt an enriched emotional affect, a comfortable and good feeling, and easy sleeping, with colorful and important dreams."


ADDERALL: Yeah. And now let's listen to a quote from someone who has just had electroshock therapy.

"Er... um... I feel... eeee.... shh... I'm sorry, what was the question again?




ADDERALL: That's all for now. I'm Adderall Zoloft.

PAXIL: And I'm Paxil Buspar.

ADDERALL: And we'll be here till Thursday -- or until the DEA figures out that we hate its guts, whichever comes first.

ANNOUNCER: This has been a presentation of the Drug War Philosopher @ abolishthedea.com, who reminds you that the Hindu religion was inspired by the use of a drug that inspired and elated, from which it follows that drug prohibition is the outlawing of religion. This is Goodman Johnny speaking. Stay tuned for more comic sendups of America's illogical, racist and superstitious Drug War, right here on abolishthedea.com.



Author's Follow-up:

April 25, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




Alfred North Whitehead wrote the following observation in "The Concept of Nature":

"The substantial reason for rejecting a philosophical theory is the 'absurdum' to which it reduces us."


Clearly, we need to reject materialism 2 -- at least in terms of its pretentions in the field of psychology. That ideology has led to the most absurd result imaginable: namely, the utter blindness of materialists to common sense -- to the extent that they would sacrifice their own gray matter on the altar of their faith in reductionist science.

Of course, we can ascribe at least some of the absurdity to the Drug War propaganda of censorship, which has censored all talk of positive drug use from our lives. But I never realized how successful that propaganda has been before I started encountering this conviction on the part of psychiatrists that brain damage was better than drug use.

Shock therapy is simply our modern version of blood letting. It is performed based on dogmatic assumptions and has nothing to do with common sense or even sanity.

Have these masochist psychiatrists never heard of Alexander Shulgin, or of the Hindu religion for that matter, or of the "quarterly carouses" of opium 3 using poets in the 19th century? Do they really think that the best way to treat depression is to decrease mental capacity? Do they really truly see no therapeutic power in elation and ecstasy and self-transcendence and rapture? Please tell me that these fans of brain damage are joking.

Well, I suppose Mary Baker Eddy would be proud of those of us who choose brain damage over the use of substances that are part of the politically demonized category called "drugs."






Author's Follow-up:

October 20, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




Shock therapy? How about trying cocaine first? Sigmund Freud considered it to be a cure for depression. The drug was demonized by doctors who saw their jobs disappearing should this panacea be available for the depressed. And so they judged the drug by focusing only on the vast MINORITY of people who misused it -- folks who were never educated about SAFE use in the first place. This is precisely as if they were to judge liquor by considering drunkards only. That's the REAL story about cocaine 4 5 : self-interested doctors threw the depressed under the bus. Their Hippocratic Oath was: first, make a buck.

That doctors today would prefer shock therapy shows that they have been duped by their own propaganda. Moliere parodied this gullibility 400 years ago in 'The Imaginary Invalid':

ARGAN: But doctors themselves must believe in the truth in their science since they use it on themselves.

BROTHER: That's because there are some in their number who suffer from the same delusion by which they profit.

--The Imaginary Invalid by Moliere, produced by Yuri Rasovsky










Notes for essay entitled Fried Brains Over Easy: another Drug War Comedy Routine: live from the DEA Lounge:

1: COPS PRESENTS the top 10 traffic stops of 2023 DWP (up)
2: How materialists lend a veneer of science to the lies of the drug warriors DWP (up)
3: The Truth About Opium by William H. Brereton DWP (up)
4: Sigmund Freud's real breakthrough was not psychoanalysis DWP (up)
5: “Freud on Cocaine : Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.” 2023. Internet Archive. 2023. https://archive.org/details/freudoncocaine0000freu/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater. (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




And where did politicians get the idea that irresponsible white American young people are the only stakeholders when it comes to the question of re-legalizing drugs??? There are hundreds of millions of other stakeholders: philosophers, pain patients, the depressed.

Videos about science and psilocybin are funny. They show nerds trying to catch up with common sense.

The drug war controls the very way that we are allowed to see the world. The Drug War is thus a meta-injustice, not just a handful of bad legal statutes.

If media were free in America, you'd see documentaries about people using drugs wisely for a wide variety of praiseworthy purposes.

The DEA outlawed MDMA in 1985, thereby depriving soldiers of a godsend treatment for PTSD. Apparently, the DEA staff slept well at night in the early 2000s as American soldiers were having their lives destroyed by IEDs.

Why does no one talk about empathogens for preventing atrocities? Because they'd rather hate drugs than use them for the benefit of humanity. They don't want to solve problems, they prefer hatred.

We've all been taught since grade school that human beings cannot use psychoactive medicines wisely. That is a defeatest lie. It's criminal to keep substances illegal that can awaken the mind and remind us of our full potential in life.

Drug prohibition is a caustic lye that destroys every democratic freedom that it comes in contact with.

The UN of today is in an odd position regarding drugs: they want to praise indigenous societies while yet outlawing the drugs that helped create them.

In America, they save the depressed from cocaine and opium by turning them into patients for life with dependence-causing "meds." Now 30-year-old doctors get to treat 67-year-olds like children, with new visits every damn three months.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)