an open letter to posterity from the only philosopher in the world who is pointing out the full evil of drug prohibition despite being completely ignored by the mainstream
by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher
March 20, 2026
I do so hate to brag, but there is at point which humility becomes a kind of dishonesty. Know, therefore, that I am the only one in the world who has pointed out that assisted suicide cannot be discussed advisedly without discussing the drug prohibition that renders it necessary. There, I've said it. What's more, drug prohibition denies us the kinds of drugs that might make us want to live. Drug use inspired the Vedic religion and use of the coca leaf was -- and continues to be -- an inspiration to the Inca and their descendants. What does it say about America when I am the only one who connects these facts? And I have not sat on this stuff. I have spread the news to the movers and shakers in the assisted suicide game and no one even acknowledges my letters.
I do not say that all pain patients could necessarily be helped in this way -- but I am saying that it is evil not even to try to help them in this way, just as it would be evil to withhold medicines for "physical" purposes.
One of the main problems is that that we have placed doctors in charge of mind and mood medicine. And so the conversation on this topic is going on behind academic paywalls in the form of heavily annotated papers from folks without any skin in the game and who completely ignore the power of drugs to inspire and elate. I am not invited to the party where my fate is decided by our highly paid professionals who are dogma-bound to ignore common sense when it comes to drugs, like the obvious fact that laughing gas cheers one up and the once-obvious fact that it is better to use drugs than to die! Imagine that.
But then I am also the only one in the world who has pointed out that outlawing laughing gas is the outlawing of academic freedom. It truly seems like drug-bashing and drug-scapegoating is built into America's DNA. The irony is that so many Americans pride themselves on recognizing and denouncing colonialism when they see it, and yet by promoting drug prohibition, they are promoting pharmacological colonialism around the world, ending the time-honored use of substances that for more intelligent cultures were used wisely.
Iranians were peaceably smoking opium until the Shah of Iran outlawed the drug at the behest of America -- the same America that is now worried that Iranians are hotheads?
I write this short essay just to remind posterity: I want credit where credit's due -- assuming that the western world ever comes to its senses -- or better yet to the senses of holistic-thinking indigenous peoples -- when it comes to drugs.
PS If I'm wrong, let me know. But I have yet to hear of any philosopher but myself (or academic, for that matter) who is complaining to the FDA about their plans to outlaw laughing gas, complaining on behalf of academic freedom and the legacy of William James. In fact, the online biography for James at his alma mater of Harvard University does not even mention James' use of laughing gas, which changed his whole ideas about consciousness and the nature of reality! Likewise, I have heard of no one else pointing out the glaringly obvious fact that assisted suicide cannot be advisedly discussed without discussing the drug prohibition which keeps folks from adopting positive attitudes and hence potentially deciding to live instead of die! Let me know who's out there that is speaking up on these topics. I'd love to chat with them! I know there are plenty of enemies of drug prohibition in general, but I have yet to hear these rather obvious points being made by any of them. The laurels seem to be mine for now. And just imagine how brainwashed the world has become to make a relative dimwit like myself the leader in this field. Wow! It's flattering in a way. Thanks for hanging back, everybody, and letting an unknown contender take the lead.
Now I'll just wait for posterity to sing my praises -- assuming of course that sanity one day prevails.
Key Takeaways:
Assisted suicide cannot be discussed advisedly without discussing drug prohibition.
Drug use inspired the Vedic religion.
No one in the assisted suicide debate acknowledges the existence of outlawed substances that inspire and elate.
Freud found that cocaine CURED most people's depression and he "got off it" without trouble.
American businesses judge people, not by the color of their skin but by the contents of their digestive systems.
If Fentanyl kills, then alcohol massacres. The problem is drug prohibition, not drugs.
If they're going to throw doctors in jail for prescribing too much pain medication, they should also throw them in jail for prescribing too LITTLE.
This is the problem with trusting science to tell us about drugs. Science means reductive materialism, whereas psychoactive drug use is all about mind and the human being as a whole. We need pharmacologically savvy shaman to guide us, not scientists.
Getting off antidepressants can make things worse for only one reason: because we have outlawed all the drugs that could help with the transition. Right now, getting off any drug basically means becoming a drug-free Christian Scientist. No wonder withdrawal is hard.
John Halpern wrote a book about opium, subtitled "the ancient flower that poisoned our world." What nonsense! Bad laws and ignorance poison our world, NOT FLOWERS!
First we outlaw all drugs that could help; then we complain that some people have 'TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION'. What? No. What they really "have" is an inability to thrive because of our idiotic drug laws.
Why don't those politicians understand what hateful colonialism they are practicing? Psychedelics have been used for millennia by the tribes that the west has conquered -- now we won't even let folks talk honestly about such indigenous medicines.
The goal of drug-law reform should be to outlaw prohibition. Anything short of that, and our basic rights will always be subject to veto by fearmongers. Outlawing prohibition would restore the Natural Law of Jefferson, which the DEA scorned in 1987 with its raid on Monticello.
Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.
I do so hate to brag, but there is at point which humility becomes a kind of dishonesty. Know, therefore, that I am the only one in the world who has pointed out that assisted suicide cannot be discussed advisedly without discussing the drug prohibition that renders it necessary. There, I've said it. What's more, drug prohibition denies us the kinds of drugs that might make us want to live. Drug use inspired the Vedic religion and use of the coca leaf was -- and continues to be -- an inspiration to the Inca and their descendants. What does it say about America when I am the only one who connects these facts? And I have not sat on this stuff. I have spread the news to the movers and shakers in the assisted suicide game and no one even acknowledges my letters. 
(up)