Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Speaking Truth to Substack

It's another Notes Day for the Drug War Philosopher

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher (Substack version)

August 5, 2026






Aha! It's your lovable old Drug War Philosopher here, going through the notes from the Kingdom of Substackia that have caught my attention over the last seven days. I noticed in doing so that the "regretful Libertarian" from last week is still spreading misinformation and hasty conclusions to anyone who will listen. You remember RL: he regrets being a Libertarian because he now sees that cracking heads is called for when it comes to stopping human beings from accessing the bounty of Mother Nature. He somehow has no interest in cracking the heads of beer drinkers, however. He apparently thinks that the ingredients for that beverage bypassed Mother Nature and were handed directly to humankind from the Godhead (him, her or itself). But I am silent. I have a policy in place whereby I do not allow myself to get irritated by the same person two weeks in a row, so I will not bother to show wherein he does offend THIS week. (Grumble, grumble, grumble.)

I'm glad to say that most of this week's notes are not actually wrong in any way since they are really just click-bait designed to get people chatting. There are, however, one or two posts that are not necessarily wrong in themselves but whose wording implies a wrong way of looking at the world. I'm always tempted to respond to such implicit falderal, even in advance of the erroneous individual's attempts to formulate his or her basic misunderstanding into words. That's basically the tack that I took on the post by Dr. Muir below, because I just knew from experience that the end of antidepressants that both he and Mark Horowitz were apparently advocating was going to end up being an attempt to get people off drugs entirely, and not just an attempt to get us off "meds." Of course, there's always the small chance that Dr. Muir will turn out to be the first doctor I know of who advocates an end to drug prohibition on behalf of his patients' right to heal, in which case, won't I have egg on my face! -- but I will be the first to apologize (and to sign up for an office visit) should my scruples be gainsaid in that manner. Hey, I'm nothing if not fair, folks.

Irritation Level: low
FROM: Mental Health 4 Men
NOTE:
If you were to give a Ted talk to men regarding their mental health, what would be your main point? (And why?)
COMMENT:
That the outlawing of drugs is the outlawing of our right to heal, and that drugs actually have benefits, even though our government is spending $50 billion a year to convince us otherwise.


Irritation Level: medium
FROM: Owen Scott Muir, M.D.
NOTE:
Ending Antidepressants: a conversation with Mark Horowitz.
COMMENT:
I am a 67-year-old chronic depressive who has to see a doctor one-third my age every three months of my life to qualify for yet another prescription for an underperforming and dependence-causing “med” that is harder to kick than heroin. Yes, we have to “end” antidepressants, but not to turn the world into drug-hating Christian Scientists. We need to end the drug prohibition which tells us that time-honored panaceas have no positive uses whatsoever. [It turns out that Oscar only allows subscribers to comment.]


Irritation Level: low
FROM: Liv Kissper
NOTE:
What subject can you talk about for hours without repeating what everyone already says?
COMMENT:
Drug prohibition.


Irritation Level: low
FROM: Amalya Sukiasyan
NOTE:
What are the enemies of truth?
COMMENT:
Drug prohibitionists.


Irritation Level: medium
FROM: Andrew M. Weisse
NOTE:
Psilocybin Potency Is Far Less Predictable Than Most Think
COMMENT:
This is pretty much true of all psychedelics. The effects produced are a joint production of the user and the substance. I have read many user reports from Erowid and Fadiman and Stanislav Grof and Alexander Shulgin that verify this fact. I also have personal experience in which a small physical amount produced an experience much greater than that produced by many times that physical amount. Even the same amount in the same person has different effects when taken at different times. This is less surprising when we consider that the outcome of use is not just a product of the drug but of the enormously complex human mind working with the drug. It is not so much that the drug is unpredictable bur rather that the human mind is unpredictable, and can get different things out of the same substance at different times — sometimes even nothing, and sometimes even “the face of God.”


Irritation Level: medium
FROM: Mental Health 4 Men
NOTE:
Best mental health advice you can give someone? Go!
COMMENT:
Learn all the things about drugs that our government does not want you to know. Read books like Pihkal, Tihkal, Ceremonial Chemistry, and the Truth about Opium by William H. Brereton. You'll slowly come to realize that drug prohibition is the outlawing of your right to heal.











read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




There are endless ways that psychoactive drugs could be creatively combined to combat addiction and a million other things. But the drug warrior says that we have to study each in isolation, and then only for treating one single board-certified condition.

When people tell us there's nothing to be gained from using mind-improving drugs, they are embarrassing themselves. Users benefit from such drugs precisely to the extent that they are educated and open-minded. Loudmouth abstainers are telling us that they lack these traits.

Proof that materialism is wrong is "in the pudding." It is why scientists are not calling for the use of laughing gas and MDMA by the suicidal. Because they refuse to recognize anything that's obvious. They want their cures to be demonstrated under a microscope.

Prohibitionists will me that we're all children when it comes to drugs, and can never -- but never -- use them wisely. That's like saying that we could never ride horses wisely. Or mountain climb. Or skateboard.

All uplifting drugs are potential antidepressants. Science denies that fact by claiming that drug efficacy must be proven quantitatively. And so they ignore anecdote, history and psychological common sense.

Even the worst forms of "abuse" can be combatted with a wise use of a wide range of psychoactive drugs, to combat both physical and psychological cravings. But drug warriors NEED addiction to be a HUGE problem. That's their golden goose.

Billboards reading "Fentanyl kills" encourage the creation of racist legislation that outlaws all godsend uses of opiates. Kids in hospice in India go without morphine because of America's superstitious fear of opiates.

Scientists are censored as to what they can study thanks to drug law. Instead of protesting that outrage, they lend a false scientific veneer to those laws via their materialist obsession with reductionism, which blinds them to the obvious godsend effects of outlawed substances.

"Dope Sick"? "Prohibition Sick" is more like it. The very term "dope" connotes imperialism, racism and xenophobia, given that all tribal cultures have used "drugs" for various purposes. "Dope? Junk?" It's hard to imagine a more intolerant, dismissive and judgmental terminology.

If fearmongering drug warriors were right about the weakness of humankind, there would be no social drinkers, only drunkards.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)