Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


The Final Solution

When demagogues follow drug prohibition ideology to its logical conclusion

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher (Substack version)

July 30, 2026



I was hoping to unwind this morning by writing a mere “blog” entry, secure in the knowledge that I could thereby speculate at will about drug-related matters without feeling compelled to write an official “article” complete with footnotes and annotations. In so doing, I could get my mind off of the choplogic that I was subjected to yesterday while responding to the brainwashed notes of drug-hating Americans, like the hypocritical apologetics of a self-styled "regretful Libertarian" who claims that it is now our duty to lock people up for using the plant medicines of Mother Nature. "Yes, of course!" I thought to myself, "just as long as we don't lay a hand on your booze or meds, right?" I wondered if my fingers could even keep up when it came to typing the plethora of rebuttals that immediately suggested themselves to my indignant mind. "Says YOU," I think to myself, as my outraged fingers rattled away on my SteelSeries Apex 5 or whatever, speaking truth to dunderheads. But that was yesterday, on so-called "Note Wednesday." Today I can relax, take it easy, and maybe even highlight the funny side of that blackest of black comedies that we call the War on Drugs. Ah, yes. Today will be a relaxing day, a day to reward myself for a job well done!

Vain hope! Just as I started to snap my suspenders in confirmation of my upcoming bliss, I noticed an email in my inbox from the Drug Policy Alliance. “Hmm,” I said to myself, “what are they on about now? It’s no doubt another pitch in favor of harm prevention when they should, by rights, be championing benefit production, given both what we know about drugs and what we’re learning every day about the extraordinary potential of their strategic usage.” So thinking, I clicked on the proffered link, only to be confronted with the following highly depressing news flash:

Over the last year, the Trump administration has bombed 67 boats and killed 221 people in the name of stopping drugs from entering the U.S. 1
Drug Policy Alliance

Well, that wiped the self-satisfied smile off of my face pronto, let me tell you — which is no surprise, of course, given that Trump’s actions were a slap in the face to everything that I had ever learned about justice, humanity and the rule of law. Relaxation was now out of the question. How could I relax and “take the long view” about drug prohibition when Drug War fanatics were now invoking the “final solution” in their attempt to rid America of the scourge of Mother Nature’s blessings? “Strange,” I thought. “I’ve always known that America was determined not to let me use godsends like cocaine for healing — but I always underestimated the extent to which they would go to keep me dead sober and as depressed as possible: they would kill those people who merely SEEMED to be interested in supplying me with Mother Nature’s uplifting bounty. Even the Conquistadores of Peru were not so meticulous in their attempts to outlaw native healing protocols.”

It will be argued that this practice of killing drug suspects overseas has been going on for decades, and that is certainly true, as Dawn Paley clearly demonstrates in Drug War Capitalism.2 The difference is that the trial-free killing that was once hushed up and considered to be anything from “shady” to “shameful” has now become the open policy of the U.S. government.

And make no mistake, what our Murderer in Chief is doing overseas will eventually be done stateside unless Americans wake up. The first domestic victims will be drug dealers with the drug users following close behind. It’s the slippery slope that Nixon knowingly started us down by referring to his attempts to control human mentation as a “war,” a rhetorical ploy that is now supposed to have sanctioned real murder in the real world. It’s the “final solution,” brought about by Drug Warriors thanks to their attempts to control the human mind in what Whitehead would have called “willful ignoration” of the clear and obvious benefits of outlawed substances. It is the triumph of the kind of fearmongering that inspired the Hutu to kill hundreds of thousands of Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, egged on by a broadcaster called RTLM, Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines.3 Trump will demand nothing less than a repeat performance, this time to be egged on by FOX News. In doing this, it’s important that we remember: he will not be creating some brand-new state policy out of whole cloth; he will simply be taking the inherently evil policy of drug prohibition to its logical conclusion. Such injustice was inherent in drug prohibition from day one. The proof is extant with the ongoing nullification of the Bill of Rights in the name of fighting drugs: drug prohibition is a caustic lye that destroys every democratic freedom that it comes in contact with.

AFTERWORD

Trump’s actions were predictable. This is what happens when we elect a lawless felon to the highest office in the land. But the most depressing thing about this story is the news coverage that it elicited from our supposedly liberal media. The Washington Post writes: “Deadly U.S. boat strikes have failed to curb cocaine supply, Pentagon and DEA officials say.” Meanwhile, NPR tells us that: “Boat strikes have not reduced drug smuggling into the U.S.” It might be said that the media is just trying to tell us here that the strikes have failed, even on their own terms, and yet there is more than a hint of an evil suggestion as well: namely, that the extrajudicial killings might have been acceptable to many if not most Americans, provided only that they had indeed cut down on the use of a plant that the Inca considered to be divine. One can only conclude that our leaders, even in the war against drug prohibition itself, simply know nothing about “drugs” except that it is their duty as Americans to hate them with all their heart and all their mind and all their soul. They know nothing of William James or of Alexander Shulgin or of Richard Schultes or of the xenophobic and racist roots of our laws against heroin, cocaine and hemp.

They have gladly taken up the pitchforks of the uninformed peasantry at the behest of fearmongers and are now marching toward the remaining outposts of propaganda-free thought in America, determined to convert the entire population to the drug-hating religion of Christian Science, will they or no. And one wonders how this ignorance will ever be corrected. Our media refuses to publish anything positive about drug use while the popular view is that it is wrong to even educate Americans about safe use. The prehistoric message to our young people is clear: do not understand drugs; just fear them.

As the character K remarks in chapter 1 of “The Trial” by Franz Kafka:

Calls for a slight attack of despair.


AFTERWORD 2

Here is an anecdote that helps illustrate my claim that a callous disregard for life and law were inherent in drug prohibition from the start. In the mid-seventies, my then-teenage brother sailed alone down the Intracoastal Waterway of the United States from southeastern Virginia to Georgia. During the trip, his boat was approached by a Coast Guard vessel and boarded, apparently because he fit the profile of a sea-going drug courier. Having found no drugs onboard, the Coast Guard departed, but not before revving their engines to max power, nearly capsizing my brother’s boat. This is just one of endless examples of how drug prohibition brings out the “inner Nazi” in law enforcement personnel of all kinds.

See related note and comments at: https://substack.com/@richardhenryparrish2/note/c-305089300?utm_source=activity_item

Note:

I received a comment stating: "Trials don't matter, trials only reinforce the laws written in favor of drug prohibition." That is a relevant concern -- however, in America, there is such a thing as annulment. A jury can refuse to convict because they believe that the law is unjust. I believe this is another reason why plea deals are popular -- because prosecutors fear the use of annulment.









Notes:

1: “Drug Policy Alliance.” 2000. Drug Policy Alliance. https://drugpolicy.org/. (up)
2: ThriftBooks. 2026. “Drug War Capitalism.” ThriftBooks. 2026. https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/drug-war-capitalism/9217021/?resultid=e8667266-257a-41bf-83e3-78200e3527f3#edition=8539401&idiq=10283063. (up)
3: Shepley, Nick. 2025. “Hate on the Airwaves: The Role of RTLM Radio in Inciting a Genocide - Explaining History Podcast.” Explaining History Podcast. https://explaininghistory.org/2025/10/31/hate-on-the-airwaves-the-role-of-rtlm-radio-in-inciting-a-genocid (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




Scientists are responsible for endless incarcerations in America. Why? Because they fail to denounce the DEA lie that psychoactive substances have no positive medical uses.

We need a few brave folk to "act up" by shouting "It's the drug war!" whenever folks are discussing Mexican violence or inner city shootings. The media treat both topics as if the violence is inexplicable! We can't learn from mistakes if we're in denial.

All the problems that folks associate with drugs are caused by prohibition. Thousands were not dying on the streets when opioids were legal in America. It took prohibition to bring that about.

M. Pollan says "not so fast" when it comes to drug re-legalization. I say FAST? I've gone a whole lifetime w/o access to Mother Nature's plants. How can a botanist approve of that? Answer: By ignoring all legalization stakeholders except for the kids whom we refuse to educate.

If Americans cannot handle the truth about drugs, then there is something wrong with Americans, not with drugs.

In his treatise on laws, Cicero reported that the psychedelic-fueled Eleusinian Mysteries gave the participants "not only the art of living agreeably, but of dying with a better hope."

Anyone who has read Pihkal by Alexander Shulgin knows that the drug warriors have it exactly backwards. Drugs are our friends. We need to find safe ways to use them to improve ourselves psychologically, spiritually and mentally.

Prohibitionists are responsible for the 200,000-plus killed in the US-inspired Mexican drug war in the 21st century.

Almost every mainstream article about psychology and consciousness is nonsense these days because it ignores the way that drug prohibition has stymied our investigation of such subjects.

No wonder conservatives are terrified of drugs. It is not safety that worries them, else they would demand education. They are terrified of new ways of seeing life. The outlawing of drugs is the outlawing of whole mindsets. It is a meta injustice.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Drama lovers: collect full-cast recordings of classic plays

In my spare time, when I am not shaming drug warriors for their heartless drug policies, I create full-cast recordings of classic plays using the latest in synthetic voices licensed by the Natural Reader company. Snag your copy of my production of Volpone, by Ben Jonson... and follow me on Payhip for more where that came from, including classics like The Post Office, The Double Dealer and The Inspector General. -- Yours in all-too-justified outrage, the Drug War Philosopher @ abolishthedea.com.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)