
Yesterday, I published my first essay that was inspired by events in a country other than the United States or the United Kingdom. The essay was entitled When America says 'Hate drugs!'... 1 and it was inspired by a story entitled A disabled man was sent to prison. He self-medicated with marijuana. 2 The story was posted online by a Bulgarian news service, Darik News, which is a subsidiary of Netinfo, which is a Bulgarian digital media company -- which is in turn owned by Nova Broadcasting, which is in turn part of United Group, "a leading telecommunications and media operator in Southeastern Europe." The link was provided by a reader who has been after me for some time to write about drug attitudes from a more global perspective. I was happy to oblige, the more so in that I cannot afford to ignore any reader who cares enough about the issues that I raise to actually get in touch with me. Such readers are rare, to put it mildly, although that is not surprising. Everyone knows that Drug Warriors are ruthless and that anything you say in favor of beneficial drug use can and will be held against you, perhaps even in a court of law. Even this reader of mine is obliged to use aliases whenever he shares his drug-related views with me.
Here's the first step in the FDA process for evaluating a psychoactive drug:
Ignore all glaringly obvious benefits.
Opium and cocaine have a vast host of potential rational uses -- yet we all have to pretend otherwise in the age of the Drug War.
Mad in America solicits personal stories about people trying to get off of antidepressants, but they will not publish your story if you want to use entheogenic medicines to help you. They're afraid their readers can't handle the truth.
Two of the biggest promoters of the psychedelic renaissance shuffle their feet when you ask them about substance prohibition. Michael Pollan and Rick Strassman just don't get it: prohibition kills.
There is more hope in dope than there is in the psychiatric pill mill.
The so-called "herbs" that witches used were drugs, in the same way that "meds" are drugs. If academics made that connection, the study of witchcraft would shed a lot of light on the fearmongering of modern prohibitionists.
Being less than a month away from an election that, in my view, could end American democracy, I don't like to credit Musk for much. But I absolutely love it every time he does or says something that pushes back against the drug-war narrative.
We know that anticipation and mental focus and relaxation have positive benefits -- but if these traits ae facilitated by "drugs," then we pretend that these same benefits somehow are no longer "real." This is a metaphysical bias, not a logical deduction.
Drug prohibition is the perfect racist crime. It brought gunfire to inner cities, yet those who seek to end the gunfire pretend that drug prohibition has nothing to do with it.
Guess who's in charge of protecting us from AI? Chuck Schumer! The same guy who protected us from drugs -- by turning America into a prison camp full of minorities and so handing two presidential elections to Donald Trump.

(up)