Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Hey, you! You should have the right to take care of your own health.

Yes, YOU!

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

June 29, 2026



As a newcomer to Substack, I have been attempting to seek out Substack leaders in the realm of healthcare freedom and the field of so-called mental health. I am told that this is how one makes friends and grows one's Substack audience in one's chosen niche, by finding such movers-and-shakers and commenting usefully on their own posts and notes. "Fine," I think to myself, "let's get to work, then, shall we? We've got this." And yet in trying to stick to this sensical protocol, I am discovering a big problem. It seems that my outlook on these topics is so far ahead of the curve that any comments I might make on the work of my mainstream contemporaries are sure to "come off" as sounding like a reproach. This is because I have yet to find one psychiatrist or psychologist who sees -- or is willing to admit to seeing -- any connection between drug prohibition and the disempowerment of the depressed in the age of the psychiatric pill mill. Imagine that: no one can see why folks like you and I should have the right to take care of our own health as we see fit. Alas, Drug Warriors understood all too well that propaganda works, especially when the conglomerate media refuses to publish any stories about the wise, positive and beneficial use of demonized substances.

To be sure, the mental health field seems to have made some common-sense progress over the years. Many of the community leaders are now taking Szaszian criticisms on board and distancing themselves -- if not divorcing themselves entirely -- from the biochemical view of human beings as an automaton susceptible to one-size-fits-all pharmaceutical cures for problems that are inherent in the human condition. And yet these leaders -- who are often far less than half our age, by the way -- seem to have only read Szasz's views on psychiatry without studying his views on drugs, which, from a patient's point of view at least, are intimately connected. Szasz pointed out after all that drug prohibition is the outlawing of our right to heal, insofar as self-medication has always been the norm and the right of human beings by dint of their merely having been born on planet earth. Once we unlearn the self-interested lie of the medical community that self-medication is a sin, then the world's our oyster for strategic therapeutic interventions of our own, assuming only that we commit to using Mother Nature's medicines as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity.

In light of these considerations, what the depressed really need is the right to take care of their own health, and yet I find almost no one who supports this view, either inside or outside the medical field.

How do I comment on a thread about "ADHD" when everyone (like Peter Simons of Mad in America) is writing about that condition while pretending that drug prohibition does not exist and pretends instead that they are arguing from a natural baseline, as if they were writing in a free country, not one in which the government decides what plant medicines one can study and use for any given set of behavioral symptoms?

As I search Substack on the topic of health and philosophy, I find endless comments (aka "notes") that make it clear that the commentator is "reckoning without drug prohibition," that they are considering human emotions from the point of view that the only possible therapeutic substances in the world are those created by pharmaceutical companies. It is increasingly trendy to diss such drugs, but there is no corresponding readiness to evaluate the healing power of Mother Nature's psychoactive substances.

How do we comment on a thread wherein learn-ed credentialed professionals are debating the reasons for various conditions whose origin, prevalence and significance would look entirely different in a free world, one in which we did not outlaw all substances that can inspire and elate?

Sometimes just the username itself tells me that it would be rude to respond to a note. How do you tell "The Bipolar Bro" that his namesake "illness" would not even be a "thing" were we Americans merely free to use the plants and fungi of Mother Nature for human benefit?

I'd love to rush out there and say nice things about people who are talking sense on Substack -- but in my niche, I find that almost no one is talking sense. Everybody is "reckoning without drug prohibition," pretending that drug prohibition is a natural baseline from which to discuss the illnesses imagined by doctors in the DSM.

My only hope is that I will speak a home truth someday that will resonate with someone who is willing to change.

Having thus vented my frustrations as a newcomer to Substack, I now present my latest attempts to comment on health-related Substack posts while yet keeping a civil tongue in my head. The fact that you yourself (of all people!) have read thus far encourages me to think that I may have not entirely failed at this task.



COMMENT ONE


SUBSTACK: The Drug Intelligence Bulletin

AUTHOR: Keith Graves

POST: The Cartels' New Bombing Campaign 1

COMMENT: With respect, the Drug War is a make-work project for law enforcement. Thanks to drug prohibition, I have to see a doctor 1/3 my age every three months of my life to get a refill on an expensive, underperforming, and dependence-causing "med" that is harder to kick than heroin. It was a crime against humanity to outlaw Mother Nature in the first place.


COMMENT TWO


SUBSTACK: The Real Seed Company

AUTHOR: Unkown

POST: Thomas Szasz: The Right to Take Drugs 2

COMMENT: I’d thank you if I knew your name. You don’t seem to be AI, since AI responses are based on what most people think, and such common sense is rare these days. Drug prohibition has turned me into a ward of the healthcare state by “saving me” from drugs like opium and coca and shunting me off instead onto an expensive, underperforming and dependence-causing “med” that is harder to kick than heroin. I am pushing back against drug prohibition at my new Substack, in defense of my right to heal.


COMMENT THREE


SUBSTACK: Datura

AUTHOR: DATURA

POST: Various posts on the subject of "forced institutionalization" 3

COMMENT: Hi, Datura. I have been turned into a ward of the healthcare state by drug prohibition which has denied me the right to use the plant medicines that grow at my feet. Instead, I have been shunted off for 30 long years onto an expensive and underperforming "med" that is harder to kick than heroin. I have to see a doctor 1/3 my age every three months of my life to get a refill on this mind-scrambling drug. I believe that the outlawing of Mother Nature's medicines was a crime against humanity. I need hardly add that I am ignored by the mainstream, told to shut up and take my meds. If this story resonates, I invite you to visit my new Substack on the subject at substack.com/@brianquass


COMMENT FOUR


SUBSTACK: Sayer Ji's Substack

AUTHOR: Sayer Ji

POST: When an Ancient Spice Puts Modern Psychiatry to Shame 4

COMMENT: There are endless drugs that can work miracles for unique people. I am fighting for the end of drug prohibition as the outlawing of my right to heal. I am in the minority, however. Even Mad In America will not publish my views. Everyone seems to think that science has all the answers and that I should just shut up and take my meds. Actually, Mad in America has a Christian Science slant on these topics: they don't think that I should use any substances at all, tho' I suppose they would sign off on the odd beer and the daily use of coffee. But they would never condone my use of the kinds of substances that have inspired entire religions. That would be going too far, that would be going native, I guess. So firmly are they convinced of the need for abstention from drugs that they see no connection between assisted suicide for the depressed and the fact that we have outlawed all drugs that could make the suicidal wish to live.

And so when I tipped them off about Claire Brosseau's attempts to have the state kill herself, they saw no need to rush to press. They don't consider that I have any standing on such topics, since I'm just a depressed "patient," despite my 45 years of use of an expensive and underperforming "med" that is harder to kick than heroin. What do I know? Until I get honorifics beside my name or until I write a bestseller, my job is to listen to my betters tell me about matters of mind and mood. Indeed, Robert told me they would not publish my story just minutes before I had to leave my house to travel 45 miles to see a doctor 1/3rd my age to request a refill on an expensive and underperforming "med" that is harder to kick than heroin. It seems like that day was specifically designed to put me in my place as a mere "patient."

There are plenty of sites out there that want to help the med-dependent, very few that want to listen to them -- unless they are speaking the party line according to which scientists and journalists are the experts on what people like you and I should or should not feel. ....









Notes for essay entitled Hey, you! You should have the right to take care of your own health.: Yes, YOU!:

1: Graves, Keith. 2026. “The Cartels’ New Bombing Campaign.” Drugintelligencebulletin.com. Drug Intelligence Bulletin. June 11, 2026. https://www.drugintelligencebulletin.com/p/the-cartels-new-bombing-campaign. (up)
2: Unknown author. 2026. “Thomas Szasz: The Right to Take Drugs.” The Real Seed Company: The Honest Online Source for Cannabis Landraces Est. 2007. February 14, 2026. https://landrace.blog/2026/02/14/thomas-szasz-the-right-to-take-drugs. (up)
3: Datura. Substack. 2024. “Datura.” Substack.com. 2024. https://substack.com/@vayt4uk. (up)
4: Ji, Sayer. 2026. “When an Ancient Spice Puts Modern Psychiatry to Shame.” Substack.com. Sayer Ji’s Substack. June 25, 2026. https://sayerji.substack.com/p/when-an-ancient-spice-puts-modern. (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




Both physical and psychological addiction can be successfully fought when we relegalize the pharmacopoeia and start to fight drugs with drugs. But prohibitionists do not want to end addiction, they want to scare us with it.

"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies." -- Groucho Marx

Conservatives say they're against Big Government -- but they let bureaucrats decide what medicines they can use.

The war on drugs has destroyed America's faith in the power of education. In fact, it has made us think of education as WRONG in and of itself. It has made us prefer censorship and fear-filled ignorance to education!

Q: Where can you find almost-verbatim copies of the descriptions of religious experiences described by William James? A: In descriptions of user reports of "trips" on drugs ranging from coca to opium, from MDMA to laughing gas.

We've created a faux psychology to support such science: that psychology says that anything that really WORKS is just a "crutch" -- as if there is, or there even should be, a "CURE" for sadness.

I'm grateful to the folks who are coming out of the woodwork at the last minute to deface their own properties with "Trump 2024" signs. Now I'll know who to thank should Trump get elected and sell us out to Putin.

Most people think that drugs like cocaine, MDMA, LSD and amphetamines can only be used recreationally. WRONG ! This represents a very naive understanding of human psychology. We deny common sense in order to cater to the drug war orthodoxy that "drugs have no benefits."

Imagine educational documentaries showing how folks manage to safely incorporate today's hated substances into their life and lifestyle.

Wanna show drug warriors the error of their ways? Legalize all less dangerous drugs than alcohol and then deny work to those who test positive for liquor and confiscate their property if beer cans are found on-site.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)