Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow


Staggering Blind Spots, Batman! Why scientific materialists are blind to drug benefits

an open letter to James Glattfelder, author of The Sapient Cosmos: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Reality and Mind

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher (Substack version)

November 1, 2026



Dear James,

I very much enjoyed your video presentation for the Galileo Commission on "The Sapient Cosmos: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Reality and Mind."1 Bravo! I was hoping that you might be interested in some thoughts that I had on a number of the important issues that you raised. If so, maybe we could exchange ideas. I am a 68-year-old American who has been studying these subjects for years. Although I am not a "board-certified" philosopher, I have been writing philosophical essays on these topics from what I believe to be a totally unique viewpoint. I am a med-dependent chronic depressive who has been turned into a ward of the healthcare state with the help of scientific materialism.

As you may know from the work of the Shulgins2 (to say nothing of the work of Aleister Crowley3, De Quincey4, James Fadiman5, et al.), drug prohibition outlawed all substances that could improve my mood while shunting me off onto a Big Pharma "med" that turned out to be far harder to kick than heroin. I have to see a doctor who is one-third my age every three months of my life in order to qualify for yet another prescription of a highly dependence-causing "med" that I do not even wish to be taking. In each session, I am asked humiliating questions, such as, "Have you considered suicide lately?", to which I always want to reply: "Only when I consider how drug prohibition has turned me into a ward of the healthcare state and a child for life."

STAGGERING BLIND SPOTS

But the key point here is this: that I have identified the philosophy of scientific materialism as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in causing my disempowerment. This is because materialist doctors judge drug efficacy, not by listening to user reports but rather by looking under a microscope. They want to see if a drug is behaving in a way that conforms with the latest theories of the biochemical determinists. This explains why America's FDA does not even consider laughing gas to be of any use for the depressed. Scientists do not care how much one laughs: they want to find a "REAL" cure for depression -- or in other words, they want to find a cure that works according to the standards set by reductive materialism.

Anyone who is aware of the state-of-the-art in pharmacology and ethnobotany knows that there is a potentially endless list of drugs that could improve mood and inspire positivity, yet the scientific materialist is dogmatically required to ignore them all. This is because the materialist's role model is Dr. Spock of the original Star Trek television series, a passion-free logician who thinks that "Laughter is highly illogical, Captain," and so is unimpressed with the phenethylamines, tryptamines, laughing gas, coca, opium, and other drugs that could make one laugh6. No, the materialist wants a "real" cure. In other words, they are on a metaphysical quest for the holy grail of a reductionist "cure." In maintaining this attitude, they are helping to normalize drug prohibition by giving a veneer of "science" to the absurd claims of the DEA that time-honored godsends can have no positive uses whatsoever.

Aleister Crowley wrote the following about his first use of cocaine: "The depression lifted from my mind like the sun coming out of the clouds." A participant in a Shulgin study wrote the following about his use of a phenethylamine: "I acknowledged a rapture in the very act of breathing." But such reports do not count as evidence for materialists. It is simply a matter of faith for them that "drugs cannot help." And this situation is well beyond parody. Today's medical ethicists are opining on state-assisted suicide for the depressed, while refusing to discuss the fact that the state has outlawed all drugs that might make a depressed person wish to live. Our materialists tell us that they would prefer that a depressed person kill themselves rather than to use "drugs." They tell us this both by what they do and what they refuse to do, both by what they say and what they refuse to say. I have yet to find one medical ethicist who is willing to speak up on this subject. Meanwhile, my essays about state-assisted suicide for the depressed are barred from publication by the Mad in America website, a website that sets itself up as the champion of the rights of the med-dependent depressed7. I am told that I have "no standing," this despite the fact that I've been on these "meds" for over 40 years. This is just another way of telling me to "shut up and take my meds." The experts, I'm told, are the materialist medical scientists who upload heavily annotated papers on the topic that they place behind expensive academic paywalls.

WILLIAM JAMES

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a 35,000-word entry for William James, yet the text says nothing about nitrous oxide or James's beliefs about consciousness8. The online biography for James at his alma mater, Harvard University, does not mention these things either9. Neither of these institutions respond to my complaints on this topic. Both universities have rewritten history to create a sort of "William James Lite," which will not offend either materialists or Drug Warriors.

FREUD AND EXPERIENTIAL EPISTEMOLOGY

In my view, Freud made two mistakes10. First, he assumed that the therapist could, without bias, identify a single traumatic cause for behavioral problems. There is, indeed, such a cause to be found in exceptional cases, as, for instance, when a soldier begins evincing counterproductive behavior after the nearby explosion of an IED. But in most cases, counterproductive behavior in life is the result of a vast array of forces (biological, sociological, psychological, genetic, etc.) that interact and reinforce and "cancel each other out" in all sorts of ways. (See chaos theory. See also Whitehead on "causation as immanence.") Second, Freud wildly overestimated the therapeutic value of "words, words, words." He ignored what you referred to as "experiential epistemology." He assumed that a cure would take place when one knew the supposed cause of their own counterproductive behavior, as if the human being were a computer just waiting for the correct data in order to function properly. His assumption about the power of words only makes sense in light of the materialist's exorbitant faith in rationality. Absent this faith, it is clear that the world does not work this way. People with counterproductive behaviors need experiential "cures" in order to change their ways, not rational "cures."

As a teenager, Paul Stamets11 ended his stuttering problem in one afternoon thanks to his chance consumption of a handful of psilocybin mushrooms. The resulting experience, in some unfathomable way, got him "out of his head" so that he could understand and fix the stuttering problem by himself, on the spot, not thanks to logic, analysis and words, but rather via a method for which the west seems to lack a word but which certain indigenous people would refer to as the power of "teacher plants" or "teacher fungi."

WE HAVE A DUTY TO BECOME HAPPIER PEOPLE

I fully agree insofar as happiness, appropriately defined, is a prerequisite for maximal functioning in life. It is interesting, in this connection, to examine the list of drugs that are outlawed in the States (and I'm sure in Europe, as well). They seem to have nothing in common except for the fact that they all have the potential to make people happier. It would appear that the State is jealous of such empowerment, but there's a second message here as well. The materialist medical professional also has a vested interest in outlawing drugs. In a world of wisely used legal drugs (where epistemology is experiential instead of rational), materialists would no longer be the well-remunerated experts and gatekeepers for psychoactive substances.

BRAINS IN A VAT

Whenever people fear that they may be a "brain in a vat," I comfort them as follows. I remind them that the assumed "overlords" who are keeping their brains in a vat must live with their own uncertainties as well. Unless they themselves are literally God, they, too, must worry that they themselves are only "brains in a vat": brains in a vat that are dreaming of a world in which they are keeping brains in a vat for nefarious purposes. In fact, that might be a good definition for God: "the entity that can know with certainty that it is not a brain in a vat." (Neuroscientist Alvin Noe also makes some insightful comments about "brains in a vat" in his book "Out Of Our Heads.12")

LSD AND THE MIND OF THE UNIVERSE

William James urged his philosophical followers to study altered states. Drug prohibition has made this illegal. In other words, drug prohibition has ended academic freedom. This is why I find it hard to empathize with Christopher Bache's apparent "overuse" of psychedelics. While many focus on the fact that Bache stopped using after 20 years, I'm selfishly focused on those first 20 years of use. I'm jealous. I'm trying to deal with the fact that my government has threatened me with imprisonment if I try to carry on the philosophical work of William James with respect to consciousness and the nature of reality writ large13 14.

CONCLUSION

I think that the fight for a non-materialist mindset must eventually entail a fight for the return of the academic liberty that has been stolen from us by western governments in the name of the modern cult of substance demonization. We must fight, that is, for the return of our right to control our own mental states without government limitations. After thinking carefully about these issues for the last eight years, I have come to the following conclusion: that saying things like "Fentanyl kills" is philosophically equivalent to saying "Fire bad!" as did our paleolithic ancestors. Both imperatives would have us fear dangerous substances rather than learn how to use them as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity.

'''''''''
I'd love to hear your thoughts. Thanks again for the thought-provoking video!



PS I agree with David Lorimer about the importance of the lectures given by William James on the subject of human immortality. James has great answers for the materialist skeptic. I've recently been reading the collected letters of William James. He frequently mentions the philosopher Schiller, to whom Mr. Lorimer also referred. I look forward to reading Schiller's work as well15.

PPS Thanks also for the heads up about the book by Joseph Heinrich16. It sounds fascinating. I look forward to reading it soon.









Notes for essay entitled Staggering Blind Spots, Batman! Why scientific materialists are blind to drug benefits: an open letter to James Glattfelder, author of The Sapient Cosmos: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Reality and Mind:

1: Petrov, Nikolay. 2026. “James Glattfelder – the Sapient Cosmos: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Reality and Mind.” The Galileo Commission. July 7, 2026. https://galileocommission.org/james-glattfelder-the-sapient-cosmos- towards-a-deeper-understanding-o (up)
2: Shulgin, Alexander T, and Ann Shulgin. 2019. Pihkal : A Chemical Love Story. Berkeley, Ca: Transform Press. (up)
3: Arthur Crowley. “Full Text of ‘the Diary of a Drug Fiend.’” 1922. Archive.org. 2017. https://archive.org/stream/b29826433/b29826433_djvu.txt. (up)
4: “Confessions of an English Opium-Eater.” 2019. Gutenberg.org. 2019. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2040/2040-h/2040-h.htm. (up)
5: Fadiman, James. Psychedelicexplorersguide.com. 2011. https://www.psychedelicexplorersguide.com/. (up)
6: Glatter, Robert. 2021. “Can Laughing Gas (Nitrous Oxide) Help People with Treatment-Resistant Depression?” Forbes, June 9, 2021. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertglatter/2021/06/09/can-laughing-gas-nitrous-oxide-help-people-with-treatmentresistant-depre (up)
7: Madder in America DWP (up)
8: Stanford University rewrites the life of William James to conform with America's drug biases DWP (up)
9: How Harvard University Censored the Biography of William James DWP (up)
10: Sigmund Freud's real breakthrough was not psychoanalysis DWP (up)
11: Stamets, Paul. 2023. “Paul Stamets.” Paul Stamets. June 30, 2023. https://paulstamets.com/news/nature-portfolio-psilocybin-microdosing. (up)
12: Alva Noë. 2010. Out of Our Heads : Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. 出版商: New York Hill And Wang. (up)
13: “The Varieties of Religious Experience : William James : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.” 2021. Internet Archive. 2021. https://archive.org/details/the-varieties-of-religious-experience_202109. (up)
14: A Philosophical Review of "The Varieties of Religious Experience"-- How William James failed to connect the dots DWP (up)
15: The Information Architects of Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2026. “Ferdinand Canning Scott Schiller | British Philosopher | Britannica.” Encyclopedia Britannica. July 13, 2026. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ferdinand-Canning-Scott-Schiller. (up)
16: Henrich, Joseph, Steven J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152x. (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




The DEA is a Schedule I agency. It has no known positive uses.

Drug prohibition is the perfect racist crime. It brought gunfire to inner cities, yet those who seek to end the gunfire pretend that drug prohibition has nothing to do with it.

Even fans of sacred medicine have been brainwashed to believe that we do not know if such drugs "really" work: they want microscopic proof. But that's a western bias, used strategically by drug warriors to make the psychotropic drug approval process as glacial as possible.

William James claimed that his constitution prevented him from having mystical experiences. The fact is that no one is prevented from having mystical experiences provided that they are willing to use psychoactive substances wisely to attain that end.

The whole drug war is based on the anti-American idea that the way to avoid problems is to lie and prevaricate and persuade people not to ask questions.

And we should not insist it's a problem if someone decides to use opium, for instance, daily. We certainly don't blame "patients" for using antidepressants daily. And getting off opium is easier than getting off many antidepressants -- see Julia Holland.

The International Observer says the "core issues" causing Mexican drug violence are: "corruption, inequality, and the demand for narcotics in the U.S." Wrong, wrong, wrong. The core issue is DRUG PROHIBITION.

His answer to political opposition is: "Lock them up!" That's Nazi speak, not American democracy.

Mad in America publishes stories of folks who are disillusioned with antidepressants, but they won't publish mine, because I find mushrooms useful. They only want stories about cold turkey and jogging, or nutrition, or meditation.

Folks point to the seemingly endless drugs that can be synthesized today and say it's a reason for prohibition. To the contrary, it's the reason why prohibition is madness. It results in an endless game of militaristic whack-a-mole at the expense of democratic freedoms.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)