Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


Open Letter to Claire Brosseau

asking her to join me in fighting drug prohibition

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

February 22, 2026



Dear Claire,

I read about your situation in the New York Times article by Stephanie Nolen1. I hope you will not mind if I share my own thoughts on the subject. I am a 67-year-old chronic depressive myself who has spent a lifetime on Big Pharma drugs that never cured my depression but instead turned me into a patient for life on dependence-causing medicines. This life has given me a unique perspective on assisted suicide for the depressed, and I feel called upon to share it with you.



Above all, I wish I could convince you that your real enemy is the drug prohibition which outlaws the right for you to take care of your own health as you see fit. In the absence of drug prohibition, you would not only have access to medicines that could facilitate easy death, but you would have access to potentially thousands of substances that could make you wish to live!



It is simply not true that drugs cannot cheer you up, whatever experience you may have had with any specific drug. Cocaine is a godsend for the depressed, as Sigmund Freud well knew, before self-interested doctors demonized the drug based on its worst possible uses. It does not work for everybody, but it works for most people. Even if we accept the drug-war lie that cocaine always causes addiction, surely a cocaine addiction is better than death! But cocaine is just one of many drugs that could help the depressed when used symptomatically and in psychologically obvious protocols.



I also refer you to the user accounts of the phenethylamines synthesized by Alexander Shulgin in the early 1990s, when the chemist was granted the rare privilege of performing drug trials without the customary interference of the federal government:



"This is total energy, and I am aware of my every membrane. This has been a marvelous experience, very beautiful, joyous, and sensuous."



"A glimpse of what true heaven is supposed to feel like... In fact, the entire experience was exquisite."



"The euphoria grows in intensity for several hours and remains for the rest of the day making this one of the most enjoyable experiences I have ever had."



These are just a few descriptions of a potentially endless list of phenethylamines with obvious benefits for the depressed when used symptomatically. Then there is laughing gas, or nitrous oxide: this substance brought such inspiring visions to William James that he based his whole philosophy upon those experiences. In 'The Varieties of Religious Experience,' James quotes one N2O user as follows:



"The long dateless ecstasy of vision... the very God, in all purity and tenderness and truth and absolute love."



Surely, substances that produce such results can have enormous (and enormously obvious) benefits for the depressed!



But then it should come as no surprise that drugs can inspire us to live: we need only remember that entire religions have been inspired by their use. The Hindu religion was inspired by the drinking of the psychoactive Soma plant by the Rishis of the Punjab over 4,000 years ago, and the descendants of the Inca consider coca to be a divine plant to this very day.



Given this backstory, I was surprised and disappointed that the subject of drug prohibition was never mentioned in Nolen's story about your case, for it is drug prohibition which is denying you – and I -- the very medicines that could make both of us wish to live!



For this reason, I respectfully end this letter with the following heartfelt suggestion: that you end your fight for assisted suicide and devote your remaining years instead with me in the fight to end drug prohibition.



Drug prohibition was enacted under the assumption that the only stakeholders in the debate were the white young people whom we refuse to educate about safe drug use. But nothing could be further from the truth. Drug prohibition outlaws the right of the depressed to heal. It is as simple as that. And in your case, this deprivation is being taken to the point of logical absurdity: because, if things go according to your current plan, drug prohibition will eventually be responsible for your very death. And it will be the perfect crime, because no one will even mention drug prohibition in regard to it!



Believe me, though, it is better to use drugs than to die – no matter how much we have been educated since childhood to the contrary. And if it is illegal to use drugs, then the next best thing is to protest that criminalization loudly and clearly in the name of the human being's natural right to take care of their own health as they see fit – a right that no one ever thought of denying until prohibitionists began outlawing substances based on their racist and xenophobic opinion of the sorts of people who seemed to be using them.



Allow me, in fact, to make a specific suggestion:



that you and I form a nonprofit organization called "Chronic Depressives against Drug Prohibition." This organization would be dedicated to pointing out the inconvenient truths outlined above, and to put politicians on notice that when they outlaw so-called recreational drug use, they are outlawing therapeutic drug use as well, and that the government should have no role in deciding how we are allowed to feel in life, least of all when their laws leave the depressed with no option but suicide – suicide with the help of the very state that refuses them the medicines that could cheer them up in a trice!



Please, let me know what you think.



Best Wishes,
Brian Quass



PS I invite you to read my essays on the issues raised by your situation. I write frequently on the topic because I believe that your case illustrates everything that is wrong with drug prohibition.












Notes for essay entitled Open Letter to Claire Brosseau: asking her to join me in fighting drug prohibition:

1: Nolen, Stephanie, and Chloë Ellingson. 2025. “Claire Brosseau Wants to Die. Will Canada Let Her?” The New York Times, December 29, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/29/health/assisted-death-mental-illness-canada.html. (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




Endless drugs could help with depression. Any drug that inspires and elates is an antidepressant, partly by the effect itself and partly by the mood-elevation caused by anticipation of use (facts which are far too obvious for materialists and drug warriors to understand -- let alone materialist drug warriors!).

Now the US is bashing the Honduran president for working with "drug cartels." Why don't we just be honest and say why we're REALLY upset with the guy? Drugs is just the excuse, as always, now what's the real reason? Stop using the drug war to disguise American foreign policy.

The FDA says that MindMed's LSD drug works. But this is the agency that has not been able to decide for decades now if coca "works," or if laughing gas "works." It's not just science going on at the FDA, it's materialist presuppositions about what constitutes evidence.

David Chalmers says almost everything in the world can be reductively explained. Maybe so. But science's mistake is to think that everything can therefore be reductively UNDERSTOOD. That kind of thinking blinds researchers to the positive effects of laughing gas and MDMA, etc.

There will always be people who don't use drugs wisely, just as there are car drivers who don't drive wisely, and rock climbers who fall to their death. America needs to grow up and accept this, while ending prohibition and teaching safe use.

Almost all addiction services assume that the goal should be to get off all drugs. That is not science, it is Christian Science.

Opium is a godsend, as folks like Galen, Avicenna and Paracelsus knew. The drug war has facilitated a nightmare by outlawing peaceable use at home and making safe use almost impossible.

"I can take this drug that inspires me and makes me compassionate and teaches me to love nature in its byzantine complexity, or I can take Prozac which makes me unable to cry at my parents' funeral. Hmm. Which shall it be?" Only a mad person in a mad world would choose SSRIs.

In "How to Change Your Mind," Michael Pollan says psychedelic legalization would endanger young people. What? Prohibition forces users to decide for themselves which mushrooms are toxic, or to risk buying contaminated product. And that's safe, Michael?

Today's doctors are "quacks" because they fail to see any of the many obvious uses for psychoactive substances.


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)