Homepage of the Drug War Philosopher, Brian Quass
blog icon orange rss icon with stylized radio waves bird icon for twitter bird icon for twitter substack icon


back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow


How to Unite Drug War Opponents of all Ethnicities

Open letter to Sean McAllister, drug policy reform lawyer

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

April 23, 2020



Dear Sean Mcallister,

I just watched your presentation on the MAPS1 Webinar and enjoyed it greatly. When you have a moment, I have some ideas for you about the strategy of drug decriminalization.

Update: May 16, 2025

You say that it's difficult to find a single unifying motive around which a variety of folks can come together to fight in favor of psychedelic decriminalization. I think there are two main reasons why that problem exists.

1) Drug-law reformers fail to understand (and therefore to adequately publicize) the enormous shortcomings of the current pill-mill approach to modern psychiatry. Those who really understand these shortcomings (especially those, like myself, who have been victims of them) consider psychedelic legalization to be a moral imperative! What shortcomings? Well, one in eight 2 male Americans are addicted to anti-depressant SSRIs and one in four females - an addiction problem that the hypocritical Drug Warrior ignores, as do most psychiatrists. And, as Julie Holland reports, many of these antidepressants 3 are harder to kick than heroin 4. These Big Pharma meds turn the individual user into a lifelong patient who has to take these pills every day of their life, which is expensive and demoralizing - but results in just so many annuities for uber-rich Big Pharma . What's more, Robert Whitaker has shown that these drugs actually cause the chemical imbalances that they purport to fix! And now they're being marketed to toddlers!!!


The failure of decrim advocates to point these things out makes me fear that they're afraid to criticize Big Pharma and the American Psychiatric Association. But if these things were known and publicized - along with the psychotherapeutic promise of psychedelics and the fact that they're non-addictive - then there should be a vast community of interested parties lined up to push through psychedelic legalization in order to unhook America and empower folks who are otherwise being turned into "eternal patients." But first someone's got to speak up to the American public and tell them that the psychiatric emperor is wearing no clothes - despite the fact that many doctors have appeared on shows like Oprah over the years (under the pay of Big Pharma ) to suggest otherwise. But if we pretend that psychiatry as it exists now is just fine, then few people are going to get excited about legalizing exotic-sounding drugs that can replace the status quo.


2) There is another reason why the psychedelic decriminalization project does not attract more benefactors. That is because this approach ignores the root problem behind ALL drug laws, both in regard to psychedelics, cocaine and opium 5 , etc. The original sin of the Drug War is that, beginning in 1914, it began criminalizing Mother Nature's plants. I believe that this can and must be construed as a violation of the natural law upon which this nation was founded. Surely, Thomas Jefferson never for a moment thought that government had the right to give or withhold access to specific plants based on political considerations. I can think of no more obvious fundamental right than our right to what John Locke referred to as "the use of the earth and all that lies therein." By failing to make this point, and arguing for piecemeal legalization of certain plants instead, we are basically conceding that government does have the right to interfere with our access to Mother Nature's plants in the first place. We just want to carve out a few exceptions to that rule. But if we wish to unite all reformers with a common goal, we need to argue for the re-legalization 6 of Mother Nature's plants, period, full stop - for which I've even created a bumper sticker on my website, AbolishTheDEA.com: "END DRUG WAR SHARIA - RE-LEGALIZE PLANTS."






Besides violating natural law, the Drug War is a violation of the separation of church and state. Why? Because laws that prohibit the use of plant medicines represent the enforcement of Christian Science with respect to emotional healing. Again, this line of argument is one that can be advanced in regard to both psychedelics and cocaine 7 8 , etc., and thus it is an approach that could bring together the otherwise culturally separated parties. Once we recognize the common denominator in all drug-war problems - the original sin of criminalizing plants - we reformers can all come together under one banner to denounce the DEA with one synchronized voice.

A comment about peyote and justice. I am sympathetic with those Native Americans who fear for the peyote supply. That said, as I understand it, their interest is in peyote that comes from specific traditional locations, such as southern Texas - and I do not believe that they would be materially injured if peyote were grown elsewhere and then used by non-Native Americans. In any case, I trust and hope that there is a way to respect all parties without using the icky expedient of embracing the intolerant and racist drug law itself. That's kind of like "finding some good" in the "three-fifths law" and embracing it for specific cases. In my opinion, we should be ending drug laws (which are really "plant laws"), rather than seeing how we can accommodate them to our own purposes, whatever our end goals might be.

In ending, I would like to share with you my number-one strategy for deconstructing the propaganda of the Drug Warrior: simply take Drug War statements and replace the word "drugs" with "plants." For instance, when Trump says that he wants to execute drug dealers (a statement that sadly seems to resonate with many Americans) re-write the sentence as: "Trump wants to execute those who deal in Mother Nature's plants." That sounds a lot less reasonable, yet that's what the Drug War really is: it's a war on plants (complete with philosophical links to the burning of plant-using witches and the Conquistadors' disdain for plant-centric religion). But the Drug Warrior knows that sounds silly. That's why they always replace the word "plants" with the pejorative and baggage-laden term "drugs."

Meanwhile, I invite you to visit my website, abolishthedea.com, and spread the word about its existence, if you believe in what I'm doing. I have about zero visitors per day because I neither advertise nor accept advertisements! But I am hoping to publish a book with my content later this year!

Best wishes, thanks, and stay well....
Ballard Quass
Abolishthedea.com

PS I believe the Drug War in the west dates back to Emperor Theodosius in 392 CE when he abolished the psychedelic-fueled Eleusinian Mysteries (after almost 2,000 consecutive years of overawing participants such as Plato, Cicero and Plutarch). Why? Because the Emperor (quite tellingly) considered the obviously compelling ritual to be a threat to Christianity9. I believe that the modern Drug War is waged for the same philosophical reason, to protect Christianity from a perceived metaphysical threat - and also for financial reasons: to support the Corrections Industry, Big Pharma , psychiatry, Big Liquor, and law enforcement - and finally to win elections for conservatives by removing leftists from the voting rolls (after arresting them for felony drug charges). Incidentally, that's another grievance on which all drug reformers can unite: the recognition that the Drug War strategically steals elections for Drug Warriors by removing thousands of Drug War opponents from the voting rolls.

PPS Better yet, put the Drug Warriors on the defensive for once. Demand that the DEA not simply be abolished, but call for a trial to prosecute those who have knowingly lied about medical godsends for 40+ years, along with DEA Chiefs like John C. Lawn, who have knowingly poisoned marijuana users with Paraquat, a weed killer that has been found to cause Parkinson's Disease. If the Drug War is an actual war, then John C. Lawn is a war criminal, who knowingly poisoned Americans, knowingly endangering their lives and ultimately punishing a misdemeanor with the potential infliction of a catastrophic illness.

NOTE: Another way to interest a wider audience in psychedelics: Highlight their ability to facilitate the growth of neurons and then perform intense clinical trials with them on Alzheimer's 10 patients. Impoverished ethnicities may think of psychedelic "trips" as a luxury, but surely they don't feel that way about preserving and restoring the memory capacity of their elderly parents.

NOTE 2: When Americans encounter unjust laws, they never do the right thing: seek to change the law in question. Instead, they seek to amend the law in order to help out certain interest groups. That's why the tax system in the US is such a mess. No one has the guts or energy to change the worse-than-byzantine nightmare that it's become. And so homeowners demand changes that will help them, investors request changes that will help them, corporations request changes that will help them -- and so the system becomes more byzantine every year.

This is why we hear talk of inequity in the fight against the Drug War. One group wants to focus on this drug, the other on that. But just like in the tax example, both sides ignore the one unifying approach that the situation cries out for. Only by rejecting the Drug War itself on first principles 11 , as a violation of natural law, can we bring about a strategy that will unite all the stakeholders: including that often overlooked and totally "unleveraged" demographic: those who go without adequate medical treatment thanks to the DEA's lies about Mother Nature's medicines.

So the anti-Drug War movement shoots itself in the foot. Its lack unity is all down to the fact that they are not focusing on the principal evil of the Drug War, namely the fact that it unjustly criminalizes Mother Nature's plants and is thus a violation of natural law. Once you rule out fighting back on this the principal ground of complaint, you're left with only piecemeal protests that attack facets of the Drug War based on parochial interests. This go-slow, selfish approach to fighting injustice is a recipe for overall failure. Until all parties recognize that the Drug War is flawed root and branch, they will remain divided and achieve only partial victories.



Author's Follow-up:

May 16, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up




How naive of me! Americans really do believe in the distinction between "meds" and "drugs" -- and they really do believe that science has got conditions like depression "sorted," as the Brits would say.

This is why progress is so glacial, because no one is willing to fight back on the basis of common sense and first principles. Americans believe in the materialist approach to mood medicine. They fail to realize that this materialist approach turns scientists into Drug War collaborators, by encouraging them to ignore all the glaringly obvious benefits of drug use.

And so no one makes the following complaints.

1) The Drug War outlaws freedom of research and has outrageously censored science so that drug benefits are never mentioned.

2) The Drug War outlaws religion insofar as the Hindu religion owes its existence to a drug that inspired and elated.

3) The Drug War is responsible for the largest pharmacological dystopia of all time: the fact that 1 in 4 American women are dependent on Big Pharma 12 13 meds for life.

What do you do when not only your opponents ignore the big issues, but so do the good guys? How do we expect the Drug War to end when we refuse to hold it responsible for all the problems that it causes?


Even freedom-loving Americans believe in the corrupt assumptions upon which that war is based: above all, they believe in the demonstrably false idea that materialist scientists are the experts when it comes to mind and mood medicine. But this is wrong. To see why, we need only consider the absurd consequences to which this category error has led us as a society: the fact that our scientists claim to find no benefits for the use of drugs that have been considered panaceas by the doctors of the past. And so we live in a world in which we would actually prefer that the depressed commit suicide 14 than to have them use the kinds of drugs that have inspired entire religions, as Soma 15 inspired the Hindu faith.

The problem is obvious. Scientists are not the experts when it comes to mind and mood medicine. It was always a category error to think so. The experts on drugs are a class of people that I call "pharmacologically savvy empaths"16. That's a profession that has yet to exist in America, but one which will be required, however, in a sane world, one in which individuals once again have sovereignty over their own mind and mood. These empaths will replace the scientists of today who can only see drugs through the passion-free lens of reductive materialism 17. For in a sane world, we will recognize the obvious: that drugs that inspire and elate actually do inspire and elate -- and that this is a good thing! It is something that we need to make happen as safely as possible for those in need, psychologically speaking. Whereas today, we simply childishly close our eyes and pretend that the kinds of substances in question here do not even exist.

This willful blindness is almost funny, did it not have so many tragic ramifications for so many people who are suffering needlessly behind closed doors and who are never considered stakeholders in America's nonsensical efforts to outlaw time-honored substances. If aliens came to earth from outer space, they would get the idea that psychoactive substances are very rare on planet earth, given the dearth of discussion about them in articles on depression and consciousness, etc.

Since writing the above essay, I have become aware of the wonderful power of phenethylamines to inspire and elate. I see, therefore, that it is not enough to re-legalize the psychoactive bounty of Mother Nature: we need to re-legalize the individual's sovereignty over their own mental states. Consider the godsend states that we are outlawing today by reading the following drug user reports from "Pihkal" by Alexander Shulgin. These are descriptions of "trips" taken on central nervous system stimulants known as phenethylamines.

"I experienced the desire to laugh hysterically at what I could only describe as the completely ridiculous state of the entire world."

"Excellent feelings, tremendous opening of insight and understanding, a real awakening."

"I acknowledged a rapture in the very act of breathing."


Such outcomes can facilitate creativity in a wide variety of common sense ways. That's the good news. The bad news is that modern drug science is all about ignoring common sense. Scientists start their drug research by ignoring all anecdote, history and common sense about drugs and then proceed to look at drugs under a microscope instead. Had this protocol been in place in 1500 BCE, there would be no Hindu religion today.











Notes for essay entitled How to Unite Drug War Opponents of all Ethnicities: Open letter to Sean McAllister, drug policy reform lawyer:

1: Three Problems With Rick Doblin's MAPS DWP (up)
2: Common antidepressants could help the immune system fight cancer, UCLA study finds (up)
3: Antidepressants and the War on Drugs DWP (up)
4: Hall, Wayne, and Megan Weier. 2016. “Lee Robins’ Studies of Heroin Use among US Vietnam Veterans.” Addiction 112 (1): 176–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13584. (up)
5: The Truth About Opium by William H. Brereton DWP (up)
6: “National Coalition for Drug Legalization.” n.d. National Coalition for Drug Legalization. https://www.nationalcoalitionfordruglegalization.org/. (up)
7: Sigmund Freud's real breakthrough was not psychoanalysis DWP (up)
8: “Freud on Cocaine : Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.” 2023. Internet Archive. 2023. https://archive.org/details/freudoncocaine0000freu/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater. (up)
9: The Eleusinian Mysteries: A Gateway to the Afterlife in Greek Beliefs (up)
10: What the Honey Trick Tells us about Drug Prohibition DWP (up)
11: A Principle-Driven Approach to Ending Drug Prohibition DWP (up)
12: Seife, Charles. 2012. “Is Drug Research Trustworthy?” Scientific American 307 (6): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1212-56. (up)
13: LaMattina, John. n.d. “Why Is Biopharma Paying 75% of the FDA’s Drug Division Budget?” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2022/09/22/why-is-biopharma-paying-75-of-the-fdas-drug-division-budget/. (up)
14: Why Americans Prefer Suicide to Drug Use DWP (up)
15: Blue Tide: The Search for Soma: a philosophical review of the book by Mike Jay DWP (up)
16: Replacing Psychiatry with Pharmacologically Savvy Shamanism DWP (up)
17: How materialists lend a veneer of science to the lies of the drug warriors DWP (up)




read more essays here





Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US




We need to start thinking of drug-related deaths like we do about car accidents: They're terrible, and yet they should move us to make driving safer, not to outlaw driving. To think otherwise is to swallow the drug war lie that "drugs" can have no positive uses.

DEA Stormtroopers should be held responsible for destroying American Democracy. Abolish the American Gestapo.

Conservatives say they're against Big Government -- but they let bureaucrats decide what medicines they can use.

Classic prohibitionist gaslighting, telling me that "drugs" is a neutral term. What planet are they living on?

America's "health" system was always screaming at me about the threat of drug dependency. Then what did it do? It put me on the most dependence-causing drugs of all time: SSRIs and SNRIs.

Almost all addiction services assume that the goal should be to get off all drugs. That is not science, it is Christian Science.

All uplifting drugs are potential antidepressants. Science denies that fact by claiming that drug efficacy must be proven quantitatively. And so they ignore anecdote, history and psychological common sense.

For those who want to understand what's going on with the drug war from a philosophical point of view, I recommend chapter six of "Eugenics and Other Evils" by GK Chesterton.

Most psychoactive substance use can be judged as recreational OR medicinal OR both. The judgements are not just determined by the circumstances of use, either, but also by the biases of those doing the judging.

I just can't believe... [image]


Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us






back navigation arrow forward navigation arrow
Book Cover

Break the ice with a sledgehammer: place this book on your coffee table.

This book features 150 annotated images, designed to force brainwashed Americans to confront the fact that drug prohibition is wrong. Here is what author Richard Parrish II says of the book's compiler: "The drug prohibition philosopher provides first-hand, principled, persuasive, and insightful arguments against the current drug prohibition regime..."

Purchase Your Copy
Book Cover

Diary of a Drug Fiend

This is the only full-cast recording of Aleister Crowley's 1922 classic paeon to common sense. It is the first book -- and so far almost the only book -- to stake out a philosophy of drug use that is compatible with human freedom, one in which we learn to use drugs as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity. This recording was produced by the Drug War Philosopher and your purchases help support his effort to push back against the tragically counterproductive policy of drug prohibition, in the name of human freedom and of humanity's right to heal.

Purchase Your Copy



No cookies, no ads paid for by amoral and immoral billionaires (or trillionaires).


Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.


Copyright 2026, Brian Ballard Quass Contact: quass@quass.com

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP (up)