It's time to stop blaming others for the problems caused by drug prohibition
by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher
March 5, 2025
hile I was looking about last year for that exquisitely rare article known as an ayahuasca ceremony inside the United States, I discovered some promising information from an outfit called Soul Quest in Florida which appeared to be facilitating such get-togethers in the Sunshine State.
Research soon revealed, however, that the organization had been disbanded in the aftermath of a death which had occurred on the premises. I did not even bother to read the details of the case, because what I was struck by as a philosopher was the hypocritical hysteria to which this incident gave rise. It was not just the Drug Warriors who were outraged, but so were ayahuasca proponents, like Steve Urquhart. The conclusion of everyone seemed to be that Soul Quest had scored a point for drug prohibition by holding an ayahuasca ceremony without proper safety protocols.
I write this essay because someone has got to point out the 6,000-pound gorilla in the room, namely, the fact that the Drug War has done everything it can to make such ceremonies dangerous by failing to regulate product and failing to teach safe use. Indeed, it prefers to scare Americans about drugs rather than educating them about them. From my perspective, the people at Soul Quest were heroes, for they alone took the enormous risks that make it possible for Americans to experience the time-honored transcendence of the Andes. I could literally find no other organization in the states that was offering such ceremonies. And while any death is tragic in itself, the fact is that the group would have been treated very differently had they experienced a fatality in any other risky activity imaginable. It is only when a death occurs during so-called 'drug use' that the axes come out to demand a victim in the name of the Drug War ideology of substance demonization. (For more on this case, see below.)
I am not going to get into the subject of what safety level is appropriate for a stateside ayahuasca ceremony and how that safety level should be attained. My point is merely that the Drug War makes it impossible to establish such safety criteria. Sure, in a sane world, there would be established safety protocols championed by curanderos, but we need the return of freedom to even begin to freely talk about such things. My point is that the real villain of the piece remains the anti-scientific Drug War and the substance prohibition for which it stands. Meanwhile, I should add, if only for the record, that some of us have always denied that government had the right to outlaw mother nature in the first place, which is what they do when they outlaw ayahuasca. Thomas Jefferson would never have signed off on such a huge governmental power grab. That is why he was rolling in his grave when the DEA stomped onto Monticello in 1987 and confiscated his poppy plants in violation of the natural law upon which he had founded America.
I practice what I preach, by the way. I eventually attended an ayahuasca ceremony facilitated by former members of Soul Quest, complete with medicine provided by a traditional Colombian curandero. I had no fear for my life because I knew that all risky activities - from mountain climbing to substance use - are just that: risky activities. I was not going to play along with the Drug Warrior by pretending that the risk of drug use was somehow qualitatively different and more sinister than any other risky activity on earth. Besides, my goal was not to live forever, which seems to be the assumption that the FDA makes when trying to 'protect me' from myself when it comes to psychoactive medicine. I wanted to experience the time-honored medicine that had helped inspire the Cosmovision of the Andes, the kind of holistic approach to life that is sorely lacking in the materialistic west. The folks from Soul Quest made that possible for me. They shouldered the legal risk associated with such ceremonies in the litigious west. That makes them heroes in my book, not villains.
Author's Follow-up: March 5, 2025
I said I was not going to get into the specifics of the Soul Quest case, but I cannot stop myself -- not after seeing Mattha Busby's article in Vice. Mattha personalizes the case with multiple photos of the 22-year-old Brandon Begley who died of an epileptic fit during an ayahuasca ceremony. Mattha makes Soul Quest out to be the villain for not calling an ambulance more rapidly, hence the title of his article, 'Bankrupt Ayahuasca Church Where Negligence Led to Death. 1'
As the only way to even potentially reach the Vice reporter was on the X platform, I responded to his article with the following three tweets:
1) 'It is our legislators who were negligent when they outlawed mother nature, thereby bringing about a huge raft of negative results for which today's reporters never hold them responsible.'
2) 'If you could be arrested for calling an ambulance, that is going to enter into your decision about when to call for help, even if it does so subconsciously.'
And finally...
3) 'In my book, the people at Soul Quest are heroes. They took on the enormous risk so that I could experience the time-honored ayahuasca of the Andes. If they reacted slowly in Brandon's case, it was because of drug laws. DRUG LAWS are the villain, not Soul Quest.'
By the way, there is something sinister about the media's habit of personalizing cases. That approach is so often misused, and Drug Warrior's love it. Take the death of 100-pound Leah Betts after dancing for hours while taking Ecstasy. Her death was turned into a cause célèbre for cracking down on Ecstasy use in Britain. News stories could not show enough pictures of Leah as a carefree teenager. There were billboards erected around the country designed to tug at the heart strings and show that this 100-pound young girl had been killed by a mean, nasty drug. Imagine if someone had personalized the case of alcohol with such photos. The country would run out of billboards. But that latter case cannot be imagined, of course, because people do not think that way about alcohol.
The fact was, of course, that the Drug War had killed Leah Betts by refusing to regulate product and by frightening her about drugs rather than educating her about them. Had she simply been told to remain hydrated while engaging in vigorous activity while under the influence, she would be alive today.
This is the point that is missed in articles like Mattha's. If Soul Quest was negligent, it was only the inevitable result of the warped incentives and disincentives that had been put in place by outlawing psychoactive substances in the first place. The real villain of the piece was drug prohibition. Mattha would seem to realize this based on a brief search into his life story and interests. And yet his article on the Soul Quest case gives the Drug War a huge mulligan for leading to unnecessary death, pinning all the blame instead on the easy target, the guys who took on enormous legal risk so that transcendence-seekers like myself would not have to. Until we start blaming drug prohibition for its decisive role in causing problems like this, it will remain a cancer on the body politic, eroding American freedoms and diverting attention from the real causes of social problems -- beginning with drug prohibition itself.
This huge social bias against 'drugs' creates disincentives to best practices in many areas of life. Take clinical drug trials of psychoactive drugs. In performing such studies for groups like the FDA, researchers are well aware of the organization's enormous prejudice against psychoactive medicines, demonstrated by the fact that they ignore all glaringly positive uses of drugs and all equally obvious downsides of prohibition. In light of this enormous prejudice, it is very tempting not to be entirely forthcoming about downsides of psychoactive drugs -- because researchers know that the pharma-backed FDA is going to grasp at any downside, however slight, to use as a fig leaf to cover their enormous bias against psychoactive drugs and so 'justify' their disapproval of the same. Meanwhile, of course, alcohol kills 178,000 a year in America and it's not seen as a problem. Meanwhile, the FDA approves of Big Pharma drugs whose advertised side effects include death itself. Meanwhile, the FDA approves of shock therapy that damages the brain. And yet we wonder why groups would not wish to be entirely open with this money-driven behemoth about psychoactive downsides?
Discussion Topics
May 23, 2025
Attention Teachers and Professors: Brian is not writing these essays for his health. (Well, in a way he is, actually, but that's not important now.) His goal is to get the world thinking about the anti-democratic and anti-scientific idiocy of the War on Drugs. You can stimulate your students' brainwashed grey matter on this topic by having them read the above essay and then discuss the following questions as a group!
How does the Drug War make it difficult to ensure safety at ayahuasca ceremonies?
In what sense can the people at SoulQuest be considered heroes?
Explain how personalized stories about so-called drug victims are extremely misleading, statistically speaking, and as such constitute drug-war propaganda.
Explain the 'enormous prejudices' of the FDA in evaluating psychoactive drugs.
Ayahuasca
The medicine that Terence McKenna called 'the television of the Andes.'
In an ideal world, we would replace psychiatrists with what I call pharmacologically savvy empaths, compassionate healers with a vast knowledge of psychoactive substances from around the world and the creativity to suggest a wide variety of protocols for their safe use as based on psychological common sense. By so doing, we would get rid of the whole concept of 'patients' and 'treat' everybody for the same thing: namely, a desire to improve one's mind and mood. But the first step toward this change will be to renounce the idea that materialist scientists are the experts when it comes to mind and mood medicine in the first place. This is a category error. The experts on mind and mood are real people with real emotion, not physical doctors whose materialist bona fides dogmatically require them to ignore all the benefits of drugs under the belief that efficacy is to be determined by looking under a microscope.
This materialism blinds such doctors to common sense, so much so that it leads them to prefer the suicide of their patient to the use of feel-good medicines that could cheer that patient up in a trice. For the fact that a patient is happy means nothing to the materialist doctor: they want the patient to 'really' be happy -- which is just there way of saying that they want a "cure" that will work according to the behaviorist principles to which they are dedicated as modern-day materialists. Anybody could prescribe a drug that works, after all: only a big important doctor can prescribe something that works according to theory. Sure, the prescription has a worse track record then the real thing, but the doctor's primary job is to vindicate materialism, not to worry about the welfare of their patient. And so they place their hands to their ears as the voice of common sense cries out loudly and clearly: "You could cheer that patient up in a jiffy with a wide variety of medicines that you have chosen to demonize rather than to use in creative and safe ways for the benefit of humankind!" I am not saying that doctors are consciously aware of this evil --merely that they are complicit in it thanks to their blind allegiance to the inhumane doctrine of behaviorism.
This is the sick reality of our current approach. And yet everybody holds this mad belief, this idea that medical doctors should treat mind and mood conditions.
How do I know this?
Consider the many organizations that are out to prevent suicide. If they understood the evil consequences of having medical doctors handle our mind and mood problems, they would immediately call for the re-legalization of drugs and for psychiatrists to morph into empathizing, drug-savvy shamans. Why? Because the existing paradigm causes totally unnecessary suicides: it makes doctors evil by dogmatically requiring them to withhold substances that would obviously cheer one up and even inspire one (see the uplifting and non-addictive meds created by Alexander Shulgin, for instance). The anti-suicide movement should be all about the sane use of drugs that elate. The fact that it is not speaks volumes about America's addiction to the hateful materialist mindset of behaviorism.
More proof? What about the many groups that protest brain-damaging shock therapy? Good for them, right? but... why is shock therapy even necessary? Because we have outlawed all godsend medicines that could cheer up almost anybody "in a trice." And why do we do so? Because we actually prefer to damage the brain of the depressed rather than to have them use drugs. We prefer it! Is this not the most hateful of all possible fanaticisms: a belief about drugs that causes us to prefer suicide and brain damage to drug use? Is it really only myself who sees the madness here? Is there not one other philosopher on the planet who sees through the fog of drug war propaganda to the true evil that it causes?
This is totally unrecognized madness -- and it cries out for a complete change in America's attitude, not just toward drugs but toward our whole approach to mind and mood. We need to start learning from the compassionate holism of the shamanic world as manifested today in the cosmovision of the Andes. We need to start considering the human being as an unique individual and not as an interchangeable widget amenable to the one-size-fits-all cures of reductionism. The best way to fast-track such change is to implement the life-saving protocol of placing the above-mentioned pharmacologically savvy empaths in charge of mind and mood and putting the materialist scientists back where they belong: in jobs related to rocket chemistry and hadron colliders. We need to tell the Dr. Spocks of psychology that: "Thanks, but no thanks. We don't need your help when it comes to subjective matters, thank you very much indeed. Take your all-too-logical mind back to the physics lab where it belongs."
Saying "Fentanyl kills!" makes just as much sense as saying "Fire bad!" Both are attempts to make us fear dangerous substances rather than to learn how to use them as wisely as possible for the benefit of humanity.
The FDA is not qualified to tell us whether holistic medicines work. They hold such drugs to materialist standards and that's pharmacological colonialism.
If politicians wanted to outlaw coffee, a bunch of Kevin Sabets would come forward and start writing books designed to scare us off the drink by cherry-picking negative facts from scientific studies.
Here is a typical user report about a drug that the DEA tells us has no positive uses whatsoever:
"There is a profoundness of meaning inherent in anything that moves." (reported in "Pikhal" by Alexander Shulgin)
If you're looking for an anti-Christ, just look for an American presidential politician who has taught us to hate our enemies. Gee, now, who could that be, huh? According to Trump, Jesus was just a chump. Winning comes before anything at all in his sick view of life.
SSRIs are created based on the materialist notion that cures should be found under a microscope. That's why science is so slow in acknowledging the benefit of plant medicines. Anyone who chooses SSRIs over drugs like San Pedro cactus is simply uninformed.
Mad in America publishes stories of folks who are disillusioned with antidepressants, but they won't publish mine, because I find mushrooms useful. They only want stories about cold turkey and jogging, or nutrition, or meditation.
The so-called "herbs" that witches used were drugs, in the same way that "meds" are drugs. If academics made that connection, the study of witchcraft would shed a lot of light on the fearmongering of modern prohibitionists.
When Americans "obtain their majority" and wish to partake of drugs safely, they should be paired with older adults who have done just that. Instead, we introduce them to "drug abusers" in prerecorded morality plays to reinforce our biased notions that drug use is wrong.
Both physical and psychological addiction can be successfully fought when we relegalize the pharmacopoeia and start to fight drugs with drugs. But prohibitionists do not want to end addiction, they want to scare us with it.
In "The Book of the Damned," Charles Fort shows how science damns (i.e. excludes) facts that it cannot assimilate into a system of knowledge. Fort could never have guessed, however, how thoroughly science would eventually "damn" all positive facts about "drugs."
Buy the Drug War Comic Book by the Drug War Philosopher Brian Quass, featuring 150 hilarious op-ed pics about America's disgraceful war on Americans
You have been reading an article entitled, Thank God for Soul Quest: It's time to stop blaming others for the problems caused by drug prohibition, published on March 5, 2025 on AbolishTheDEA.com. For more information about America's disgraceful drug war, which is anti-patient, anti-minority, anti-scientific, anti-mother nature, imperialistic, the establishment of the Christian Science religion, a violation of the natural law upon which America was founded, and a childish and counterproductive way of looking at the world, one which causes all of the problems that it purports to solve, and then some, visit the drug war philosopher, at abolishTheDEA.com. (philosopher's bio; go to top of this page)
hile I was looking about last year for that exquisitely rare article known as an ayahuasca ceremony inside the United States, I discovered some promising information from an outfit called Soul Quest in Florida which appeared to be facilitating such get-togethers in the Sunshine State. 
You have been reading an article entitled, Thank God for Soul Quest: It's time to stop blaming others for the problems caused by drug prohibition, published on March 5, 2025 on AbolishTheDEA.com. For more information about America's disgraceful drug war, which is anti-patient, anti-minority, anti-scientific, anti-mother nature, imperialistic, the establishment of the Christian Science religion, a violation of the natural law upon which America was founded, and a childish and counterproductive way of looking at the world, one which causes all of the problems that it purports to solve, and then some, visit the drug war philosopher, at abolishTheDEA.com. (philosopher's bio; go to top of this page)
