Hypocritical America Embraces Drug War Fascism

introduction to the Drug War Philosopher website at abolishthedea.com

Hypocritical America Embraces Drug War Fascism

a warning to any remaining friends of freedom

by Brian Ballard Quass, the Drug War Philosopher

January 2, 2020

This morning I searched the vast image catalog of Shutterstock for some photographs that illustrated the general concept of abolishing the Drug War. I was sure I'd find something since the site has over a billion images submitted by well over half a million contributors.

Wrong.

2025 update

To my dismay, there were very few if any images that suggested, even obliquely, that the Drug War was folly. Instead, the site was full of propaganda images that associated cocaine in particular with all manner of vice. First we see an image of a white tabletop littered with bloody bullet casings and a credit card half covered with cocaine . Next we see a handgun lying in front of a half-dozen plastic bags full of white powder. One row down, there are the trademark lines of cocaine starkly displayed on a black tabletop, just waiting for some hedonist hit man to snort, no doubt before taking a scantily clad mistress in his arms and lavishing her with a highly salacious kiss. (Needless to say there are no images of Sherlock Holmes, using related substances to hone his observational skills, nor of Freud, using such substances to ensure the prolific output whereby he achieved self-actualization in life.)

Coca was a god to the Incas, and a godsend to authors like Jules Verne and HG Wells, and yet drug-war propaganda has convinced Shutterstock (and no doubt most of its contributors) to depict the plant as if it were the drug from hell. Moreover, the dystopia thus depicted is a result of the Drug War itself, which refuses to educate users about safe drug use, preferring to arrest them instead. As for the guns and violence that we associate with cocaine , that's a direct result of prohibition, not of the coca plant. Just as Prohibition created the Mafia, so the Drug War has created cartels and gangs, thus turning inner cities into shooting galleries, thanks to which thousands of minorities were killed in 2021 alone.

The answer is obvious: decriminalize drugs, cocaine first and foremost, since it seems to be the natural substance of choice for marketing illegally.

Meanwhile, take all the billions that is currently going into the fascist militarization of our police forces and give that money to clinics that will treat drug addiction rationally, rather than throwing a million people a year into jail merely for possessing natural substances. Such treatment will be far more effective than the current status quo when we allow clinicians to use any psychoactive substance in the world, rather than tyrannically limiting them to a handful of addictive medicines supplied by Big Pharma . The current criminal approach is just a make-work program for law enforcement, after all, and turns America into a police state, as our record-breaking prison population testifies loudly and clearly to the dismayed champions of freedom around the world. Besides, all the problems that we associate with so-called drug use are actually caused by the Drug War itself, starting with the fact that the Drug War demonizes illicit substances, thereby denying would-be users the objective knowledge they could use to partake wisely.

Meanwhile those who fret about the addictive potential of substances like cocaine should drop their hypocritical hand-wringing, since almost all of them are ignoring the big addiction of our time: namely the fact that 1 in 8 American men and 1 in 4 American women are hooked on Big Pharma ¹ ² antidepressants ³, many of them harder to quit than heroin ⁴. But the Drug Warrior doesn't even notice this problem, let alone wring their hands about it. What Drug War hypocrisy. What a clear sign that the Drug War is not about the health of Americans' bodies, but rather about the health of Americans' wallets -- or rather the wallets of the so-called 1% who are getting filthy rich on drug profits from addicting America to legal antidepressants.

Not only is the fascist Drug War unfair to minorities who constitute the predominant arrestees, but it results in a perversion of our electoral system, since it all but guarantees the election and re-election of fascist Drug War advocates. Why? Because those who would vote them out of office are in jail, many having lost their right to vote thanks to their possession of proscribed natural substances.

America is seeing the ascendancy of anti-democratic forces, and the evidence is not just on Shutterstock.

Hollywood ⁵ releases more movies ⁶ ⁷ every year whose plots seek to justify torture and premeditated murder as reasonable means of fighting so-called drug trafficking. In the 2019 movie 'Running with the Devil,' the self-righteous DEA 'hero' cold-bloodedly murders a man who had the temerity to sell naturally occurring substances. What's more, she murdered the 'drug dealer' while she herself was smoking a cigarette containing tobacco, one of the most harmful drugs in the world.

Hypocrite, America! Wake up! We're knowingly heading down the path of fascism, dimming the beacon of freedom that we had once hoped to be to the world.

PS How can we look Chinese President Xi Jinping in the eye and criticize his anti-democratic measures when we are arresting Americans for merely possessing the plants and fungi that grow at their very feet?!

Nor is it just the minorities that take a hit stateside. The Drug War has inexcusably blocked research on therapeutic drugs, all because of the fascist tendency to place law enforcement above every other consideration, and patients be damned.

editor note from abolishthedea.com

June 21, 2022

You rock, Brian. Except don't give that money to clinics -- give it to pharmacologically savvy empaths, who will use nature's medicines as needed to treat everything for which those medicines are suited -- yes, including addictions! Right now, if an addict walks into a clinic, the doc says, 'Now I will do all in my power to help you -- except, of course, for using the thousands of psychoactive plant medicines that are off-limits due to the Drug War.' Docs need to learn that drugs are not the problem, they are often the solution -- and we should not employ them on a niggardly and stinting basis just because the Drug War is bribing our children with teddy bears to get them to stupidly say no to Mother Nature's godsends!

Author's Follow-up: November 17, 2022

follow-up on essay by the Drug War Philosopher

AUTHOR'S NOTE, OCTOBER 2025:

I rarely delete entire paragraphs of mine upon re-reading them, but the update that was originally located here is an exception to the rule. It wasn't exactly incorrect -- but it was written in an unnecessarily apologetic tone, at a time when I was still bamboozled by some Drug War lies: especially the lie that cocaine was highly addictive. That is simply not true. Cocaine is misused by some -- for a variety of reasons -- just as alcohol may be misused -- just as any drug may be misused. But the real story about cocaine is that doctors ignored the hundreds of millions of depressed who could have ended their depression with the drug and focused instead on the relative handful of users who could not use wisely -- exactly as if they were to study alcohol by only looking at alcoholics ⁸ ⁹. They ignored the needs of hundreds of millions of the depressed. We weren't stakeholders somehow. And they had a reason for this lopsided focus.

They knew that cocaine was a threat to their business model. They did not want to cure depression, after all, they wanted to treat it, ideally with drugs that caused a lifelong dependency. This is how one makes money. By treating conditions, not curing them in real-time. I don't say that doctors were all conscious of this desire, but they certainly knew upon which side their bread was buttered when they slandered and demonized the drug in the many fearmongering op-ed pieces in newspapers around the world, libels which they continue to perpetrate today, while never pointing out, of course, that they have a vested interest in the continued outlawing of the drug.

Author's Follow-up: March 11, 2025

picture of clock metaphorically suggesting a follow-up

These are not abstract considerations. How many of us know of suicidal friends and loved ones? Well, guess what? Drug warriors would prefer that these unhappy people die rather than use drugs -- otherwise we would make uplifting drugs available to the suicidal. We show by our actions -- our drug prohibition -- that we are Christian Science fanatics. We actually prefer suicide ¹⁰ to the use of the many godsend medicines that we have outlawed wholesale.

America has a sick way of looking at the world of mind and mood medicine, based as it is on racism combined with the demonstrably false idea that materialist scientists are the experts when it comes to mind and mood. As Whitehead pointed out, the proof that a philosophy is wrong resides in the fact that it leads to absurd consequences. And what do we get when we put materialists in charge of mind and mood in fealty to the philosophy of materialism ¹¹? We find that we have experts who are dogmatically blind to common sense. They are dogmatically blind to all reports of positive drug use. They are deaf to anecdote and history and even to psychological common sense, which tells us that feeling good -- and looking FORWARD to feeling good -- actually help. Instead, they tell us that drug efficacy is to be found under a microscope, which in the practical world means that they sign off on the DEA lie that time-honored panaceas have no positive uses whatsoever.

In writing the following, French philosopher Merleau-Ponty recognized the purblind nature of materialist science, although he failed to grasp the obvious connection between this viewpoint and the western world's jaundiced view of so-called "drugs."

"Scientific thinking, a thinking which looks on from above, and thinks of the object-in-general, must return to the 'there is' which underlies it; to the site, the soil of the sensible and opened world such as it is in our life and for our body -- not that possible body which we may legitimately think of as an information machine but that actual body I call mine, this sentinel standing quietly at the command of my words and my acts." --from The Essential Writings of Merleau-Ponty ¹²

Pharmacologically Savvy Empaths

Notes:

1: Seife, Charles. 2012. “Is Drug Research Trustworthy?” Scientific American 307 (6): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1212-56. (up)
2: LaMattina, John. n.d. “Why Is Biopharma Paying 75% of the FDA’s Drug Division Budget?” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2022/09/22/why-is-biopharma-paying-75-of-the-fdas-drug-division-budget/. (up)
3: Antidepressants and the War on Drugs DWP (up)
4: Hall, Wayne, and Megan Weier. 2016. “Lee Robins’ Studies of Heroin Use among US Vietnam Veterans.” Addiction 112 (1): 176–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13584. (up)
5: Blast-off for Planet Hypocrisy! DWP (up)
6: Glenn Close but no cigar DWP (up)
7: Running with the torture loving DEA DWP (up)
8: Corner on Coca! DWP (up)
9: Sigmund Freud's real breakthrough was not psychoanalysis DWP (up)
10: Why Americans Prefer Suicide to Drug Use DWP (up)
11: How materialists lend a veneer of science to the lies of the drug warriors DWP (up)
12: “The Essential Writings of Merleau-Ponty : Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 1908-1961 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.” 2021. Internet Archive. 2021. https://archive.org/details/essentialwriting0000merl/mode/2up. (up)

read more essays here

Ten Tweets

against the hateful war on US

Until prohibition ends, rehab is all about enforcing a Christian Science attitude toward psychoactive medicines (with the occasional hypocritical exception of Big Pharma meds).

There are a potentially vast number of non-addictive drugs that could be used strategically in therapy. They elate and "free the tongue" to help talk therapy really work. Even "addictive" drugs can be used non-addictively, prohibitionist propaganda notwithstanding.

There are endless creative ways to ward off addiction if all psychoactive medicines were at our disposal. The use of the drugs synthesized by Alexander Shulgin could combat the psychological downsides of withdrawal by providing strategic "as-needed" relief.

To say that psilocybin has not been proven to work is like saying that a hammer has not yet been proven to smash glass. Why not? Because the process has not yet been studied under a microscope.

No drug causes addiction after one use. From this fact alone, it follows that even drugs like meth and crack and Fentanyl can be used wisely -- on an intermittent basis.

"The depression lifted from my mind like the sun coming out of the clouds." -- Arthur Crowley after using cocaine

Everyone's biggest concern is the economy? Is nobody concerned that Trump has promised to pardon insurrectionists and get revenge on critics? Is no one concerned that Trump taught Americans to doubt democracy by questioning our election fairness before one single vote was cast?

If politicians wanted to outlaw coffee, a bunch of Kevin Sabets would come forward and start writing books designed to scare us off the drink by cherry-picking negative facts from scientific studies.

To understand why the western world is blind to the benefits of "drugs," read "The Concept of Nature" by Whitehead. He unveils the scientific schizophrenia of the west, according to which the "real" world is invisible to us while our perceptions are mere "secondary" qualities.

Don't the Oregon prohibitionists realize that all the thousands of deaths from opiates is so much blood on their hands?

Click here to see All Tweets against the hateful War on Us

No cookies, no ads.

Unless otherwise indicated, no AI is used in the creation of site content. These essays represent the original ideas of their author and not the ideas that the author SHOULD have based on an algorithmic parsing of existing data. For more on this subject, consider the AI-related viewpoints to which the author subscribes as delineated in the New York Times opinion piece entitled "What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity" by Rebecca Winthrop of the Brookings Institution.

The Partnership for a Death Free America is a proud sponsor of The Drug War Philosopher website @ abolishthedea.com.

tombstone for American Democracy, 1776-2024, RIP

(up)